On April 9, Vitaly Votolevsky, head of the directorate of railway stations - a branch of Russian Railways (DZhV), inspected the Saransk railway station for readiness for the World Cup. He was accompanied by the chairman of the government of Mordovia, Vladimir Sushkov, and the mayor of Saransk, Peter Tultaev. About 700 million rubles were received from the federal budget for the reconstruction of the Saransk and Ruzaevsky stations. These funds were used to install baggage screening equipment, metal detectors, automated radiation monitoring systems, and much more. Details - in the report of Irina Vasnetsova.

Mayor Petr Tultaev arrived at the station earlier than the others. "I'm happy with the changes," he told reporters. Half an hour later other dignitaries arrived. “Here is modern equipment that scans a person and detects objects,” the station employee points out. - It is used if the passenger has removed all metal objects from the pockets, but the metal detector continues to beep. Here is a protective container, where suspicious baggage is additionally inspected. The same system has been installed in Ruzaevka.”

On the platform, Vitaly Votolevsky pointed to the collapsed paving stones: “Ashot Maksimovich, what is this?”. “The weather has been good for only two days, the snow has recently melted,” the contractor justifies himself. We'll fix it in three days.

Vladimir Sushkov criticized the pedestrian crossing. In his opinion, the information board hangs too low, at a height of only two meters. The prime minister asked to be hung higher. “Tall people will pass here,” he drew attention. “Think of something else, change the design.” “I am instructing: by the end of the week to figure out what to do with the scoreboard,” Votolevsky announced. “And report back immediately.”

"Why is it dirty under the bridge?" Sushkov asked. “2 thousand will be asphalted square meters square, - answered the worker of Russian Railways. - As soon as it dries, we will immediately begin. Around the end of April. There will be no mud." "I'm in control! - threatened Votolevsky. “I don’t run into, but I want to help.”

“The safety of passengers will be guarded by a rapid response team,” says a station worker. – An elevator is installed for people with limited mobility and passengers with luggage. Let's go and see." The officials entered the booth and drove down. “Everything is fine, but the inscription near the elevator is under glass,” said one journalist. “It’s uncomfortable for a blind person.”

In the premises of the station, Sushkov again made a remark: “Why is there so much information on the stand? Immediately reduce to a minimum. Who will read such fine print? “In the next hall, the booth is more interesting, with pictures,” Peter Tultaev smiled. - We will organize exhibitions of children's drawings. These have already been done." " Good idea Sushkov approved. “Guests of the World Cup will be happy.”

“We will set up a food pavilion not far from the station,” Vitaly Votolevsky shared his plans. “The entrances and exits are inconveniently located,” Sushkov noted. - Do not have to additionally inspect passengers? It is necessary to correct this moment, otherwise a double inspection is obtained.

“Vladimir Fedorovich,” Votolevsky turned to him. “I don't think beer should be sold in the buffer zone. We analyzed matches in other countries, criminal reports and made a memo for fans. The most important point is to limit the use of alcohol. As for its sale on trains, we will discuss this point with FIFA representatives.” “We will limit the sale of alcohol in the city,” 3 Tultaev reassured.

In the video surveillance room, an employee spoke about surveillance: “There are 82 cameras installed at the station. The observation post is also equipped with a video surveillance system. 13 cameras are indoors, five are outside. 13 cameras on the bridge.

“In general, FIFA requirements have been met,” Vitaly Votolevsky summed up. - Ruzaevsky and Saransk railway stations are adapted for people with limited mobility, a barrier-free environment has been created. Transport security measures are provided, repaired engineering systems. We guarantee that the stations will function properly during the World Cup. Implemented modern system informing passengers in two languages. Added chairs in the waiting rooms. Landscaping will be completed once the snow melts. The next step will be the debugging of the equipment, the interaction of the station staff, volunteers, law enforcement officers. Now the Saransk and Ruzaevsky stations are in no way inferior to the Moscow ones, with the exception of the passenger traffic.”

Since our people finally got the right to real estate, the housing market has become a real Klondike for scammers. What ways of fooling law-abiding citizens do they come up with! Unknown people appear from somewhere with wills, powers of attorney, contracts of sale and take away their natural property from citizens. Left without a stake and a yard, they seek justice in court. The court turns to handwriting experts. But they often give a conclusion: the signatures are genuine, made by the plaintiff's hand. In a word, he is a scammer. Our interlocutor, an independent handwriting expert Eduard Molokov, has repeatedly encountered such cases.

Take, for example, the real estate story of Vladimir Sushkov, once Deputy Minister of Trade of the USSR. In 1986, he was arrested right in the Kremlin. He was accused of accepting rich offerings from foreign businessmen with whom he entered into lucrative government contracts. In modern terms, he received kickbacks.

Time passed, Vladimir Sushkov served time, got out, wrote the book “Prisoner nicknamed“ Minister ”and ... died. A rather large inheritance - apartments in Moscow, a summer residence - went to an elderly sister.

After Sushkov's death, a certain Larisa Khromova (surname changed, - ed.) "Draw" who came to the notary, declared herself "Sushkov's last love" and presented a will, where it was written in black and white: "all my property, which by the day of my death will be mine, no matter what it is and wherever it is, I bequeath Khromova Larisa Vladimirovna. As confirmation of her correctness, the lady - and she was 44 years younger than the late former convict minister - brought the conclusion of the Hypothesis Bureau of Independent Expertise (the name has been changed - ed.), which confirmed the authenticity of Sushkov's signature.

You can't enter the same signature twice

- Then the sister's lawyer turned to the research laboratory forensic examinations at Moscow University,” says Eduard Molokov. - I made an examination and found out that the signature on the will is a fake. Sushkov's original signature was circled in the light.

Molokov shows two signatures allegedly by Sushkov - one was put under a fake will, the second - in the notary's registry book. In a separate picture, the expert combined both of these signatures. It turned out that they are exactly the same! So genuine?

“On the contrary,” smiles the expert. - A person is not able to sign exactly the same way twice. Try to sign several times, and then combine the signatures - you will see for yourself. This coincidence just says that both times the attacker circled the same authentic signature of Sushkov.

In addition, flaws came out during the stroke - they straightened the roundness, drew a loop instead of a corner, lowered one letter, raised another ... And the scammers did not find the legally correct full signature “Sushkov Vladimir Nikolaevich”, they had to limit themselves to the abbreviated “Sushkov V.N. » - and such a signature under the will cannot be put and certified.

“The court decided the case in favor of Sushkov's sister,” Eduard Molokov ends the story.

What about scammers? we ask.

– The sister filed a complaint against the Hypothesis experts with a request to involve them in criminal liability under article 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - “knowingly false conclusion”.

Age matters

The other case is just the opposite. The relatives of the deceased are suing the young wife of a certain Vasilyev with the accusation that the will was forged. The examination is being carried out by a certain Stepan Volya (his last name has been changed - ed.), an expert who is currently on trial for several episodes related to false examinations.

Note that a criminal record does not prevent him from continuing to work in the field of handwriting.

So, Volya determined that the will had indeed been forged. Like, the handwriting is very different. There he is confident, firm, and here he is trembling, weak. The letters are smaller. The lines are slipping. The strokes are sinuous. Well, he didn't write it, and that's it!

Vasiliev suffered from diabetes - and this disease is often accompanied by loss of vision - and Parkinson's disease. Eduard Molokov shows samples of Vasiliev's handwriting over several years. They show that in last years his life ailments progressed. Trembling and weakness of the hand led the lines down, the strokes acquired a fine sinuosity. Micrography of signs - this is when the letters become small, small - one of the signs of Parkinson's disease.

Outcome? The young (and by the way, dearly beloved) wife won the case. The prosecutor's office agreed that Stepan Volya made his conclusion "intentionally", but for some reason the case was dismissed.

Honor Independent Experts

“The trouble is that the position of a handwriting expert is not licensed,” continues independent expert Eduard Molokov. – Anyone can open an expert agency. In order for the court to accept the conclusion, the specialist who signed it must submit a certificate of relevant education. And that's it! The trick is that the license - in which case - could be taken away. And so an unscrupulous specialist can work on, tear his shirt off and claim that he has experience, and experience, and methods. And often such people, even being on trial, continue to work and draw up conclusions.

Now unscrupulous "independents" discredit the title of an independent expert. There are several "fighters of the old guard" in the city - extra-class experts who retired due to age, but could not part with their favorite profession and became independent experts. Now they are watching with bitterness as the scammers mold fake conclusions.

And they not only sculpt, but now and then bare their teeth at government agencies, such as the Russian Federal Center for Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of Russia or the Institute of Criminalistics of the Center for Complex Technical Research of the FSB of Russia. They write reviews, accuse them of incompetence, of wrong methods. “Thanks” to the already mentioned Will, experts from the RFTSSE were dragged through the courts for two years. One gets the impression that unscrupulous "independents" are waging war against the state. Meanwhile, state experts give a signature on criminal liability under Article 307 of the Criminal Code. And from private individuals - unless they are appointed by the court - there is no one to take such a subscription.

“And once upon a time, any mistake could go to court,” recalls Eduard Molokov.

Today, the trial of Will is an exceptional case, he is almost the only expert who has been put on trial. And that is not for "knowingly false conclusion", but for forging the expertise of the RFTSSE. But, we repeat, this does not prevent Volya from continuing to act as a specialist. And he does not put an end to his activities. One of the judges even admired his professionalism - of course, he found 16 matching signs!

“One trainee found 130 matching signs in the handwriting of two completely different people,” says Eduard Molokov. “Then I showed him three—only three!” - a sign that proved that the handwritings belong to different people.

How is the qualification of an independent expert now checked? Yes, none. The state every five years is obliged to pass the most difficult certification before a serious commission. Private traders at best certify each other. Why, without fear of sin, does the cuckoo certify the rooster? For the fact that he certified the cuckoo!

And who are the judges?

Let us pay attention to one more indicative moment in the case of Sushkov's inheritance. It is clear that in addition to the experts who gave a false opinion, there are two more scammers - a false heiress and a notary who certified the circled signature. However, no criminal proceedings have been initiated against them. Why? Because the sister only filed a complaint against the experts.

The question is, why are the victims either afraid or too lazy to write statements against fraudsters?

But why should an elderly woman, whose age has exceeded 85 years, write and take care of its promotion? Why didn't the court itself send a submission to initiate a criminal case against all the defendants - the "heiress", the notary, would-be specialists? Why can the authorities calmly dismiss obvious scammers and say: “we don’t have a statement”? Why is the one who circled the signature of the former prisoner nicknamed "Minister" walking around with impunity?

Sign quickly

Finally, we asked the expert for advice - how to make a signature so that it is difficult to forge? How to protect yourself from forgery of documents for living space?

- The signature should be very dynamic, - the expert believes. - Sign up fast! The faster the better. Such a signature cannot be traced, because stroke is a slow process. The attacker will have to train for a long time.

Recorded by Yana Maevskaya

As I once wrote in my LiveJournal, decisions in courts are made not on the basis of the Law, but on the status of the subjects that take part in the dispute. And if one of the parties is an official, then the decision will always be made in favor of the interest of this subject. Representatives of the prosecutor's office, investigators, law enforcement agencies act in the same way - they have enough to protect those in power with the unsubstantiated statements of officials.

According to the head of the Staroshaigovsky district of Mordovia, Mukhin G.I.
In the interests of the district administration, on the basis of an application from an administration employee to the cadastral authorities, parts of land plots for agricultural purposes are withdrawn from the property of citizens and put in the form of a land plot for cadastral registration in 2004 without making boundary files, without carrying out cadastral work, without issuing regulations.
To satisfy the interest of the head of the district, a federal employee of Rosnedvizhimost (now working in Rosreestr) needs only one application that is not executed according to the law. And that's it!
Citizens may not even apply anywhere - no one from the representatives of state bodies takes it upon themselves to declare a violation of the rights of citizens. Although, one must be honest - the employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova found signs of a criminal offense in Mukhin's actions, but the investigators "breast" defended the head.
This is our "know-how" in Mordovia for cadastral registration of land plots - investigators and the prosecutor's office "do not see" violations, and the judges said that the interests of specific citizens who went to court can allocate land for themselves in the remaining part of the land plot, i.e. their rights in such a statement on the cadastral registration of the stolen land are not violated.
Steal Mukhin property from citizens and more!
Or maybe you’ll wait for someone to arrange lynching for you, and then that’s it - law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, investigators, and judges run in, finding out why the nerves of the robbed couldn’t stand the lawlessness of those in power ?!

Administration of the city of Saransk
At the beginning (the fifth year has gone) Bikmaev Sh.Z. with the help of an unjust court decision without compensation for the building he acquired on a reimbursable basis in Soviet times, the building was taken away in the interests of the city: a land plot was needed under it, to build a hotel on it, officials received money for this (who specifically and in what amounts are not announced to us , behind the scenes naming three names - former governor Merkushkin N.I., the current governor Volkov V.D., the former mayor - the current chairman of the government of the republic Sushkov - V.F.).
After that, the turn came to the land. The basis for making unjust decisions is allegedly the existence of privatization, which in relation to the building, its premises, the production base, which included the building, was NEVER carried out, there is not a single document confirming this fact in the case files.
But ... we know that in our "legal" state, neither the Law dictates, but the interests of officials, and without such a basis, an unjust decision cannot be made.
It will not come as a surprise to me if, after some time, the indicated citizens - Merkushkin, Volkov, Sushkov "unexpectedly" on accounts in offshore companies or in houses / apartments / dachas will find undeclared in huge amounts of money, jewelry, etc. luxury goods, the value of which will be many times higher than the declared income.
I have no doubt that in addition to Bikmaev Sh.Z., there are still citizens in the republic whose property was taken away by the powers that be for personal selfish interests.

According to the head of the Chamzinsky district, Tsybakov V.G.
Here the situation is slightly different - the head of the district deliberately incites hatred and enmity of Muslims towards the authorities: he voices the desire to demolish the unfinished mosque, for the construction of which former head district issued the relevant resolutions, and the current head of the district, Tsybakov, canceled them with his will and removed the land plot for the construction of the mosque put on the cadastral register from the cadastral register.
And again, no one wants to take the liberty of representatives of state bodies to return the head of the district within the framework of the Law.

Mordovia is lucky for government officials - they can afford to deprive citizens of their property by fraudulent and / or illegal actions, to give results at 100% for the ruling party in elections.
Once again, a hot time is coming for officials - to agitate and urge citizens to vote for the ruling party - " United Russia", which "takes care of the well-being of every citizen of the republic." The cynicism and lawlessness of Mordovian officials is going wild!

A-u-u, the prosecutor's office, law enforcement officers, investigators! Isn't it time to return our republican officials to the legal mainstream? Or is it necessary for you to perform your direct duties personal instruction Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich

The Constitutional Court (CC) held open hearings on the complaint of Alexander Sushkov, former top manager of ZAO Stroytransgaz (STG), who was fired for sending inside information to himself via the Mail.Ru server. The management of STG and the courts considered this "disclosure of personal data" of the company's employees. Such an application of the Law on Information, information technology and on the protection of information” is supported by the State Duma and the Federation Council, and the plenipotentiaries of the government and the president consider it erroneous.

Former director of the department for contractual and legal work of STG Alexander Sushkov complained to the Constitutional Court about the violation of his constitutional right to privacy of correspondence judicial practice application of paragraph 5 of Art. 2 of the Law "On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection". According to this rule, the owner of information is a person who has the right to allow or restrict access to it. Mr. Sushkov asks the Constitutional Court to recognize that the interpretation of the disputed law, as granting the telecommunications operator the right to access information, is contrary to the Constitution.

The applicant lost his job in February 2016, having sent documents to his Mail.Ru server e-mail box containing passport data, addresses and positions of company employees. The courts agreed with the employer that since the operator, according to the user agreement, can restrict or allow access to the contents of mailboxes, Mail.Ru became the owner of confidential information by virtue of the challenged law. According to the Labor Code, the director of the department had no right to disclose it.

The Savelovsky District Court of Moscow considered the applicant's correspondence with himself “dissemination of commercial information to a third party”. The Moscow City Court upheld the decision Supreme Court He refused to consider the cassation complaint of Mr. Sushkov. The applicant argued that such an interpretation of the law on information violates the constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy of correspondence. The term "information holder" in other relevant laws and Civil Code does not apply, and in the law "On Commercial Secrets" "applies only to information owners." Mail.Ru determines the terms of the user agreement independently, but the practice of courts in cases of the company's right to provide information on access to user messages is contradictory - in other cases, including in the Mail.Ru dispute with the Central Bank, the courts came to the conclusion that such access is inadmissible without court decisions and the obligation of the operator to respect the secrecy of correspondence.

Representatives of the authorities consider the norm to be constitutional, but assess its application differently. The State Duma and the Federation Council believe that Mr. Sushkov was punished fairly. However, government envoy Mikhail Barshchevsky said that then he and his colleagues should be fired, stating that the license issued to the telecom operator implies the legitimacy of using its service.

Mikhail Krotov, presidential envoy to the Constitutional Court, believes that the applicant's problem is related to incorrect law enforcement practice, but the legislation in the field of regulating the organization of e-mail services and its application needs to be improved. The presidential envoy called the conclusions of the courts in the case of Mr. Sushkov “doubtful”, noting that his actions cannot be considered a deal to grant Mail.Ru the status of “information owner”, it could only be a violation of the requirements established by the employer for access to it. And the distribution of trade secrets to the personal data of employees paralyzes their ability to use the services of banks, hotels and fly by plane.

“The data of users of Mail.Ru mail, as well as other services of the Mail.Ru Group, are confidential and, in accordance with the law, their disclosure is possible only by a court decision,” Kommersant was told in the press service of Mail.Ru Group.

“The complaint raised an important issue about respecting the right to privacy of correspondence and about the limits of the possibilities of organizations providing e-mail services to access user letters,” Daria Sukhikh, senior lawyer at Team 29 (specializes in cases on freedom of information).

Violation of the secrecy of correspondence as one of the constitutional rights is possible only on the basis of a federal law, and not any user agreement, as in the case with Mail.Ru described in the complaint, Ms. Sukhikh believes.

According to the lawyer, the disputed provision of paragraph 5 of Art. 2 of the Law “On Information…” cannot be considered a law restricting the right to privacy of correspondence. According to Ms. Sukhikh, in the applicant's case, the courts of general jurisdiction “made a mistake and an obviously unreasonable interpretation of this legal provision”. The expert is not sure that in this case the Constitutional Court will consider the norm itself as violating the Constitution, since law enforcement practice generally does not attach such importance to this norm of the law, as happened in the applicant's case. But the Constitutional Court “should give its explanations on this matter and point out that the contested provision of the law should not be understood as restricting the right of a citizen to the secrecy of correspondence,” Ms. Sukhikh believes.

Anna Pushkarskaya, St. Petersburg

Do you think you are Russian? Born in the USSR and think that you are Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian? No. This is not true.

You are actually Russian, Ukrainian or Belarusian. But you think you are a Jew.

Game? Wrong word. The correct word is "imprinting".

A newborn associates himself with those facial features that he observes immediately after birth. This natural mechanism is characteristic of most living beings with vision.

Newborns in the USSR for the first few days saw their mother for a minimum of feeding time, and most of the time they saw the faces of the maternity hospital staff. By a strange coincidence, they were (and still are) mostly Jewish. Reception is wild in its essence and effectiveness.

All your childhood you wondered why you live surrounded by non-native people. Rare Jews on your path could do anything with you, because you were drawn to them, while others were repelled. Yes, even now they can.

You cannot fix this - imprinting is one-time and for life. It is difficult to understand, the instinct took shape when you were still very far from being able to formulate. From that moment, no words or details have been preserved. Only facial features remained in the depths of memory. Those traits that you consider your family.

3 comments

System and Observer

Let us define a system as an object whose existence is not in doubt.

An observer of a system is an object that is not a part of the system it observes, that is, it determines its existence, including through factors independent of the system.

From the point of view of the system, the observer is a source of chaos - both control actions and the consequences of observational measurements that do not have a causal relationship with the system.

An internal observer is a potentially achievable object for the system in relation to which the inversion of the observation and control channels is possible.

An external observer is even an object potentially unattainable for the system, located beyond the event horizon of the system (spatial and temporal).

Hypothesis #1. All-seeing eye

Let's assume that our universe is a system and it has an external observer. Then observational measurements can take place, for example, with the help of "gravitational radiation" penetrating the universe from all sides from the outside. The capture cross section of "gravitational radiation" is proportional to the mass of the object, and the projection of the "shadow" from this capture onto another object is perceived as an attractive force. It will be proportional to the product of the masses of objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them, which determines the density of the "shadow".

The capture of "gravitational radiation" by an object increases its randomness and is perceived by us as a passage of time. An object that is opaque to "gravitational radiation", the capture cross section of which is larger than the geometric size, looks like a black hole inside the universe.

Hypothesis #2. Internal Observer

It is possible that our universe is watching itself. For example, using pairs of quantum entangled particles spaced apart in space as standards. Then the space between them is saturated with the probability of the existence of the process that generated these particles, which reaches its maximum density at the intersection of the trajectories of these particles. The existence of these particles also means the absence of a sufficiently large capture cross section on the trajectories of objects capable of absorbing these particles. The remaining assumptions remain the same as for the first hypothesis, except:

Time flow

External observation of an object approaching the event horizon of a black hole, if the “outside observer” is the determining factor of time in the universe, will slow down exactly twice - the shadow from the black hole will block exactly half of the possible trajectories of “gravitational radiation”. If the determining factor is the “internal observer”, then the shadow will block the entire trajectory of interaction and the flow of time for an object falling into a black hole will completely stop for a view from the outside.

Also, the possibility of combining these hypotheses in one proportion or another is not excluded.