The decision of the court in the case of Dzhigurda. Nikita Dzhigurda deceived everyone: the court denied him the inheritance of Bratash. Have you gone to the US Supreme Court?

If someone decided that the story of Nikita Dzhigurda ended with the receipt of a multi-million dollar inheritance, he was very much mistaken.
Yesterday, all domestic media reported that the Kuntsevsky court of the capital satisfied the claim of Dzhigurda and Anisina against Svetlana Romanova, which meant that the spouses received the inheritance of their late godmother Lyudmila Bratash.

Latest news The spouses themselves reported in their microblogs. Moreover, both Anisina and Dzhigurda unanimously joyfully assure everyone of their victory. Dzhigurda also noted that the will in his favor was recognized as real.

The court's decision caused some bewilderment among Internet users, because there are too many questions left in the case, to which no one has given a clear answer.

Nikita Dzhigurda stole Marina Anisina's Instagram account

Back in early May, when Marina Anisina unexpectedly announced that she had reconciled with her husband, many of her fans could not believe it - too much dirt came to the surface during the divorce process. What was the video on which Nikita Dzhigurda had sex with Lyudmila Bratash worth. Or a video where the showman filmed a drunken Marina Anisina.

Nevertheless, in Anisina's microblog, all subsequent posts were devoted exclusively to the chanting of her husband. The figure skater tried to assure the entire Internet community that Nikita Dzhigurda was vilely slandered by envious people and enemies.

Soon Anisina's Instagram followers noticed that she began to use the speech patterns that her husband used. So, Anisina began to call her children gods.

Soon, negative comments from subscribers and uncomfortable questions regarding inheritance began to disappear.

And then Marina Anisina's Instagram began to completely duplicate Nikita Dzhigurda's Instagram. At the same time, the same posts appeared in microblogs. It became obvious that on behalf of the figure skater Nikita Dzhigurda is in charge of her Instagram.

Whether Anisina voluntarily gave her account to Dzhigurda, or whether he forcibly forces her to fill the blog under dictation, is unknown.

Today, another duplicated post appeared on the spouses' instagrams. The photo, which depicts Lyudmila Bratash, Marina Anisina and the mother of Nikita Dzhigurda, adorned the microblog of the showman and his wife at the same time. In the caption to the picture, once again the couple rejoiced at their victory in court.

On Dzhigurda’s Instagram, one of the subscribers managed to leave an appeal to the artist, where she accused him of taking over Marina Anisina’s Instagram:

linanova3820 … enough of this circus already? Is it possible to finish using Marina's name and account already? Who do you take us for? It is clear to everyone who follows you a little that you wrote the letter to Putin. It is also clear that Marina's Instagram has long been not hers but yours. So endlessly you want fame? Or complete control over the mother of your children? Isn't it embarrassing to pretend to be a woman?

The woman noted that during a recent joint press conference, Marina Anisina looked intimidated and humiliated. In a long message, the subscriber even sounded the thought that Dzhigurda was forcibly holding his wife.

The scandalous comment hung for only three hours and was deleted. Now in the Dzhigurda microblog there are only a few laudatory reviews.

The battle for Lyudmila Bratash's legacy continues. Recently, Nikita Dzhigurda said that the Kuntsevsky court recognized him as right, rejecting the defendant's claim. Now Svetlana Romanova herself made a statement, refuting the information about the end of the proceedings. According to the woman, both claims were denied, so the issue with the property of her deceased sister is still not resolved.

“The statements of Dzhigurda and Anisina that they are the heirs of my sister’s millions are a farce and a soap bubble,” Romanova commented on the situation.

The woman provided a copy of the court decision to journalists. The document says that the claim of Nikita Dzhigurda and Maria Anisina was also rejected due to the lack of the original will. Romanova herself is sure that the famous actor forged the paper in order to receive a large sum of money on it.

“Under these circumstances, the court does not find the grounds provided for by law to satisfy the claim of Dzhigurdy N.B. and Anisina M.V. on the recognition of the right of ownership by way of inheritance under a will to real estate, as well as a counterclaim by Romanova S.D. on the recognition of the will as invalid, ”the court decision reads.

According to the newspaper "TVNZ", the process is not yet complete. The answer was made by Dzhigurda himself. He is confident that the decision was made in his favor. Moreover, the actor said that he would write a statement on Svetlana Romanova to the criminal court. The man accuses her of slander.

“Judge Irina Krasavina automatically recognized the will as real, that is, legal. This fact was confirmed to the press by the former lawyer of Marina Anisina, Andrey Knyazev. A legal will gives us the right to receive the inheritance of Lucy Bratash after the entry into force of the decision! That is, in a month. During this time, Romanova has the right to appeal to the Moscow City Court, ”Dzhigurda said about the current situation on her Instagram page.

Recall that Lyudmila Bratash died in February last year, leaving a will, according to which all her fortune was to go to the Dzhigurda family. However, the sister of the deceased immediately filed a lawsuit against the actor, accusing him of forging a document and raping a businesswoman.

Marina Anisina is sure of her victory at the trial. On Instagram, the sports star posted an angry post and assured that the slanderers who wrote nasty things about the father of her children would be punished.

“I repeat once again: the will is recognized by the court as real! In the autumn we will receive Romanov's inheritance, her friends and accomplices will answer for their slander and crimes before the laws of Russia and France! Not a single criminal case has been opened against Nikita Borisovich. Dzhigurda proved our innocence, ”the figure skater emphasizes.

fans star couple confident in their rightness and support Anisina. However, at this stage, the litigation is unlikely to be completed. Most likely, Dzhigurda and his opponents will have to repeatedly prove their case in state instances.

The epic with Nikita Dzhigurda's attempts to inherit the millionaire Lyudmila Bratash, with whom the artist was very close, continues. He needs to prove his right to the wealth left by the business woman in court. However, rumors appeared on the Web that the actor won a lawsuit in the United States and not only got access to the money, but also managed to spend part of it on buying a land plot on the banks of the Volga tributary.

ON THIS TOPIC

According to lawyers, as well as sister Lyudmila Bratash, who continues to insist on her right to inherit, these rumors are nothing more than a hoax. "The message is very similar to a duck. Bratash has a sister, a citizen of Belarus, who is an heir by law," the Komsomolskaya Pravda website quotes independent lawyer Alexander Razumovsky.

He recalled that the Russian court is still considering a case in which a relative of a millionaire is trying to challenge a paper on Nikita Dzhigurda's right to inheritance. And the artist himself sued both in Russia and in France. Moreover, the French judges postponed consideration of the issue until their Russian colleagues make a decision.

“In the United States, if such a court took place, the judges should have asked if the deceased had legal heirs. In addition, in America, long periods are given for the possibility of appealing the court decision. So, Dzhigurda simply could not receive an inheritance in such a record short time would," the expert issued a verdict.

The fact that the message about the receipt of the inheritance is a bluff, the sister of Lyudmila Bratash Svetlana Romanova herself is sure. “The fact that he allegedly received my sister’s inheritance in America is another nonsense. As an heir by law, I would know about this,” she stressed.

“The information that Dzhigurda has already received Bratash’s inheritance is not true,” Oksana Filacheva, Marina Anisina’s lawyer, agreed with everyone. She recalled that consideration of the issue of inheritance in the Moscow City Court is scheduled for May 7. “Personally, I have no doubt about the legitimacy of the will. But the fact that Dzhigurda has already received part of the inheritance and even bought something for it, of course, there is no such thing. There was no court in America,” the lawyer emphasized.

The relatives of the deceased have reason to believe that the will is forged. As it turned out in court, it was drawn up on the letterhead of a company owned by the deceased. Moreover, Bratash's sister's lawyers claim that the businesswoman herself issued this form to Anissina. There is even a witness to the transfer of the document. It is also doubtful that the notary wrote her own surname with an error in the will.

Nikita Dzhigurda called all these accusations false.

The day before, the outrageous showman on social networks notified all journalists that 45 minutes before the start of the meeting he would tell the whole truth about Bratash's inheritance. However, the actor himself appeared in court, as they say, to the minute. Her hair is tied in a ponytail, her beard is decorated in the Ukrainian style, and she wears a black shirt with embroidery on the sleeves. Dzhigurda explained his image by the fact that he was offered the role of the great Ukrainian ataman.

The revelations promised by the media were more about his personal life. “There will be no divorce from Anisina! I’ll pass a drug test in front of male journalists, urinate for tests, and prove that I’m clean!” Dzhigurda said in the corridor.

“I am not a gigolo, as Zhorin claims (- “MK”). I will show my passbook, on which 400 thousand euros, I transferred another 300 to Anisina's account. For my wedding anniversary, I gave my wife an apartment. Behind last years I've made over $2 million..."

The actor kept the fuse and entered the courtroom. At first, he began to read some mantras to the camera. But suddenly he became serious. “I am a brilliant artist, I can turn on emotions. But today I will take off the mask!”

First of all, the judge asked to tell Dzhigurda how he met Lyudmila Bratash and what kind of relationship they had. Revelations poured in almost immediately.

Ludmila Bratash.

We met in 1998 or 1999 in Belarus, on the set of the film “Love in Russian-3”. Our relationship was very close, like that of a man with a woman. I responsibly declare: I had an affair with the deceased. See you Anisina.

Did your wife know that you and Bratash knew each other? the judge asked

Dont know. Lucy herself asked to hide this fact. For Marina, it remained a big question whether to marry me or not. Lucy persuaded her ...

Let's get closer to the lawsuit, - the judge could not stand it.

So it directly concerns the inheritance, - objected the showman.

To when and under what circumstances the will was written, Dzhigurda did not move soon. Before that, he told the court how he and the late businesswoman went to the witch who promised them children, how Bratash’s mother persuaded him to be baptized, and a number of other equally “important” moments.

In 2014, Lucy went on vacation with me and Marina to Turkey, and from there she went to America for a few days to write a will, - the showman finally got to the point.

The judge asked why, in the opinion of Dzhigurda, Lyudmila Bratash decided to decide the fate of the inheritance in the USA.

In Russia, all wills are entered into a common database, while in America they are kept by a notary. Lyusya was afraid that here, using the databases, her driver and sister would figure out to whom she transferred the fortune, and then they would kill ...

The showman explained in court and why, in his opinion, the businesswoman decided to leave the multi-million dollar fortune to him and Anisina, and not to her own sister. Allegedly, the deceased was offended by Svetlana Romanova because she rewrote the apartments bought by Bratash for her mother. “They didn't communicate. When I put Lucy in the clinic, she even forbade telling her sister where she was.”

He threw accusations against the sister of the deceased who was sitting here and the driver Bratash, the actor for about half an hour. Most of what was said did not apply to the will.

But the statement of Svetlana Romanova's lawyers was quite specific. "We believe that this document called 'will' is a forgery." As it turned out, it was written on the letterhead of the company owned by the deceased.

"Bratash's signature was certified by the seal of this legal entity, which indicates that the form was issued for the purpose of carrying out entrepreneurial activities.

Moreover, according to representatives of the millionaire's sister, Bratash gave Marina Anisina an empty form. And we are ready to call in court a witness who was present at the fact of the transfer of the paper.

The blank form mentioned above was issued by Anisina in the summer of 2010 to arrange an agreement with the Ice Hockey Federation regarding the transportation of hockey teams. This was done in case a letter of guarantee was urgently needed, and Bratash was away. The agreement did not take place, and the blank form remained with Anisina.

It’s not true, ”Dzhigurda flared up, who had previously carefully studied his photos on his phone.

However, this was only one of the few points that cast doubt on the authenticity of the will. Lawyers for the sister of the deceased drew attention to the fact that the text was written with spelling and punctuation errors, which Bratash could hardly have made, having a journalistic education. “In addition, the will was not drawn up in the style of the deceased.” And the notary who signed the inheritance document made a mistake in her own last name, which, you see, is strange.

Moreover, the second party in the case claims that Bratash did not travel to the United States in 2010, which can be confirmed after sending a court request to the US Embassy.

As a result, Svetlana Romanova's lawyers asked for an examination of the will. Dzhigurda vs. He does not want to give the original document. “Otherwise it will be destroyed. There were three copies: two of them were stolen from safes. If there is no third, we will be left with nothing ... "

The next meeting on the inheritance of Bratash will be held on December 9. A notary who signed the will in the United States must come to court.