Homosexuality is a disease, pathology, abnormality, defectiveness. Perverse sexual sensations Or maybe homosexuality is a new, higher level of human evolutionary development

19.02.2022

Still, sane people remained in the Old World. In any case, they are tolerant in relation to the problem that has recently acquired simply catastrophic proportions - homosexuality. Tolerant in the sense that they do not succumb to general propaganda and remain sane and are aware that these trends are, to put it mildly, unhealthy.

British doctors decided and declared homosexuality a disease. This topic is not new, WHO excluded homosexuality from the list of diseases only in 1973, before that this phenomenon fell under the category of mental disorders. And the problem of same-sex relationships has moved from medical to social.

The recognition of homosexuality as the norm in 1973 is quite understandable - it was a time of trampling on any authorities and traditional values. On this wave, homosexuality becomes an acceptable alternative way of life. Then everything went on knurled - from a defensive position homosexuals move into an offensive one - now this sexual deviation is being promoted as a bohemian and even to some extent a preferable image of human relations.

As a result, we have today's picture - the identification of homosexuality with the norm and its withdrawal from the agenda as a psychological problem. Plus widespread propaganda and the granting of official status to same-sex relationships.

In general, doctors and psychologists have not come to a consensus regarding the etiology of such a phenomenon as homosexuality. There are many versions - from the structural features of the brain to the presence of a special gene transmitted with the X chromosome. But with all this, most psychiatrists agree that homosexuality is a psychological disorder, which means that in most cases it can be corrected.

And now the English doctor Michael Davidson again returns to the practice of healing adherents of same-sex love. It is worth noting that he himself was able to overcome this pernicious passion and therefore is confident in the success of his business. Yes, and the Royal College of Psychiatrists has officially recognized that a person's sexual orientation can change. This means that you can not only become gay, but also stop being. Davidson's methods are radical - electric shock and other similar practices. Naturally, under the pretense that these are inhumane methods, the English gay lobby is sounding the alarm. And the government condemns such medical practices.

Such active resistance to the cause of healing society from filth is not surprising - the LGBT community is wrapping its web around the world. Parades, confessions, campaigning - all this works with one single goal - to germinate the seed of sodomy in the minds, to give the society the message that same-sex relationships are the norm. Expanding its spheres of influence by infusing new members into its ranks. The U.S. has moved from legalizing same-sex marriage to allowing members of the LGBT community to lead Boy Scouts. And sane people are obliged to resist this. Maybe electric shock is not the most humane therapy, but it will certainly discourage young people who want to turn into sodomites for the sake of fashion.

Some people in our progressive age believe that homosexuality is a disease. Such an opinion cannot be considered correct, since there is no such diagnosis in the list of international classification of diseases. If just a century ago, having a non-traditional sexual orientation was considered something unworthy, today even public people - actors, artists, fashion designers, etc. - do not hesitate to admit their preferences. Is homosexuality a disease? Homophobes (people who hate and are aggressive towards men who are attracted to the same sex) think so. However, the version of traditional psychiatry differs from the opinion of homophobes.

The opinion of psychiatry about the sexual orientation of a person

About what is the relationship between a person's sexual orientation and his mental state, they have been arguing for a long time all over the world. Is homosexuality a disease? And if so, is it possible to cure her, to return a man's attraction to individuals of the opposite sex? At first glance, attraction to members of the same sex is precisely a disease, since such relationships cannot lead to procreation and the birth of children. However, in our modern world, which is already "bursting at the seams" from overpopulation, this issue has ceased to be as relevant as, for example, 200-300 years ago. The number of the human population is already growing at a rapid pace, and the issue of the relevance of reproduction and procreation fades into the background. To date, the answer of modern psychiatry to the question of whether homosexuality is a disease or not is unambiguous - no, it is not. There is no such disease in the list of international classification of diseases.

How exactly do modern psychiatrists interpret the term "homosexuality"? Is it a disease or just a whim, a desire to "have fun"? Maybe these are the consequences of psychological and physical injuries that were received by a man at an early age? Is homosexuality a disease? No, this is a kind of developmental feature, a personal characteristic, but not a pathology in the truest sense of the word.

Attitudes towards homosexuality in modern society

Homosexuality, according to the modern school of psychiatry, is a violation of the psychosexual development of a male person, which leads in one way or another to the emergence of sexual interest in people of the same sex. This is the so-called deviation, but not a disease in the truest sense of the word.

Homosexuality should be attributed to disorders associated with a violation of a person's gender identity - sexual deviations. Some psychiatrists are still of the opinion that homosexuality is a mental illness that requires therapy in the same way as phobias, anxiety and depressive disorders. Allegedly, homosexuality is also preferences that were acquired by a person during his life, and not acquired at birth, not innate. Based on this view, we can conclude that homosexuality can be cured - if you find a way to "reflash" the relationship received by a homosexual.

But is it necessary for the most "sick" person? After all, most often they live a happy and full life, which would be the envy of any "healthy" people with a traditional sexual orientation. Heterosexuals often have a much larger number of casual sex and can not always call themselves happy.

The famous Dutch psychiatrist Johan Leonard, who devoted a lot of time to researching the phenomenon of non-traditional sexual orientation, wrote: “For many years of my practice, I have never seen a healthy and happy homosexual, homosexuality is not a hereditary disease, it is just a symptom of a certain neurotic personality disorder.” However, this statement is rather controversial - in fact, only those homosexuals who are aware of their inferiority turn to a psychotherapist - this is usually caused by an extremely negative attitude towards homosexuality on the part of society. How can a person be happy whose views are often ridiculed even by their own parents and closest friends? Of course, he cannot call himself happy, he thinks that he is sick - so he is forced to turn to a psychotherapist for help. In progressive, developed countries, where the phenomenon of homophobia is eradicated, people with non-traditional sexual orientation feel quite happy.

Symptoms: how and in what manifestations of non-traditional sexual orientation in a man

Modern psychiatry identifies the following criteria by which we can talk about the presence of non-traditional sexual orientation among the stronger sex:

sexual interest in men and a complete lack of such interest in women;
almost always the body of a sexually mature woman can cause negative emotions, up to disgust;
a tendency to sexual deviations of a different kind - often like games with dominance and submission, bondage, etc .;
a tendency to create illusions and a self-image that does not correlate with reality;
do not consider their deviation a problem, do not think about whether homosexuality is a disease;
prone to outrageous appearance - often the desire to make up the face and eyes, do makeup, wear bright and tight-fitting clothes is irresistible, even if there is a risk of being subjected to aggression from surrounding homophobes;
many people with non-traditional sexual orientation, even having one permanent partner, tend to feel desire for other men.

How to recognize homosexuality in a child at an early age? As a rule, homosexuality can be recognized already in the first ten years of a future man's life. To do this, you need to be a fairly attentive specialist, since the signs of homosexuality are quite easy to confuse with other manifestations of neuroticism, anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. So, the boy can trace the following symptoms of a future non-traditional orientation:

the desire to play and interact (be friends, communicate) exclusively with persons of their own sex;
rejection of the main characteristics of one's own sex - masculinity, strength, responsibility;
in role-playing games, she willingly and happily tries on female roles - mothers, mistresses, daughters, wives;
timidity, anxiety even for minor reasons;
disgust and unwillingness to participate in team sports that require the manifestation of masculinity, strength, making quick and responsible decisions.

Reasons for the development of non-traditional sexual orientation in men

If we assume that homosexuality is a disease, then we can try to identify the main stages in the development of this deviation. According to those psychiatrists who believe that homosexuality can be "cured", the reasons for the development of this pathology are as follows:

Scientists for many years tried to discover the "gene" of homosexuality, but they failed to do this - this fact indicates that the deviation is not inherited - the reasons for its development are purely psychological. Studies that have been conducted with identical twins have proven that one of the brothers can be homosexual, while the other is heterosexual.
Often the development of homosexual behavior in adulthood is preceded by the experience of childhood rape by a man and the resulting psychological trauma.
Voluntary homosexual experience in the past (whether in childhood or adolescence) also contributes to the development of persistent non-traditional orientation.
Character traits such as egocentrism and infantilism also contribute to a tendency to sexual perversion and, as a result, to homosexuality.
The lack of care and communication on the part of the father, the deprivation of the boy's father for one reason or another may cause the development of non-traditional sexual orientation in the future (it is highly undesirable to recreate a negative image of the father in the boy's memory - this is almost guaranteed to lead to an unhealthy perception of men by the boy).
If the father suffered from alcoholism, there was physical violence in the house, the child often felt fear and did not feel happy - this can cause the development of various kinds of sexual deviations in the future.
If the mother or other family members constantly punished the boy, ridiculed his vulnerability and anxiety, used cruel corporal punishment against him - in the future he may become bisexual or get other problems and deviations of sexual development.
If a mother desired the birth of a daughter more than the birth of a son, and raised the boy with overprotectiveness, this may lead to the development of homosexuality in the future.
Growing up in an environment filled with triggers for misbehaving sexual behavior is "a bad example is contagious." It is important to provide the boy with interesting and varied leisure activities that correspond to his gender role. Visits to radio engineering circles, sports sections, team sports classes are excellent for this.

Psychiatric diagnoses that may accompany homosexuality

As a rule, homosexuality is accompanied by the following psychiatric conditions and pathologies:

suicidal thoughts;
schizophrenia in varying degrees of severity;
depressive, anxiety disorders;
bipolar disorder;
narcissism.

However, it cannot be said with certainty that homosexuality and mental disorders always go together. Studies and testing have proven that there are also mentally stable homosexuals who have not shown any symptoms of mental abnormalities. Modern psychiatry no longer raises the question of whether homosexuality is a disease or a normal state. It is clear that this is a variation of the norm. But if a person with a different orientation has symptoms of other mental disorders in parallel, they should be treated first of all. Whatever the causes of homosexuality, this deviation is secondary. First of all, depression and similar disorders, which are really diseases, should be dealt with first.

Treatment of homosexuality: myths and reality

Is it possible to return a person to a heterosexual orientation? This question has occupied the minds of psychiatrists for a long time. Therapy of homosexuality at the moment is not possible, and the main question in this case is why treat a person who is actually healthy. This question comes from a basic one: Is homosexuality a disease? After all, if not, if a person is healthy - what kind of treatment can we talk about?

However, in the last century, quite a few experiments were carried out, sometimes cruel and humiliating for the patient, during which attempts were made to cure the "mental illness" of homosexuality.

The first researchers of the question of homosexuality among psychologists came to the conclusion that homosexuality is a mental disorder or even a degenerative disease that should be treated. Methods of treatment, often forced, offered a wide variety - from electroshock therapy to castration.

To date, the question "Is there a cure for homosexuality?" not relevant. This is a relic of the past. Since since 1990 this pathology has not been included in the international classification of diseases (ICD-10), then talk about the "treatment" of homosexuality is incorrect and offensive to people with an unusual orientation.

The difference between bisexual and homosexual behavior

There is little difference between bisexual behavior (when a man is equally aroused by both sexes) and homosexual (when a man is only attracted to members of his own sex). Both variants of sexual behavior from the point of view of modern psychiatry are the norm and do not belong to painful conditions.

The causes of homosexuality and bisexual behavior are very similar and often lie on the same plane of psychology. However, if you dig deeper, it becomes clear that the degree of deviation directly depends on the initial qualities of a person's character - how impressionable, vulnerable, anxious he is. After all, some children grow up in an incomplete family (as one of the possible causes of sexual deviations) and end up with a heterosexual deviation. And others grow up in an incomplete family, and their worldview, inclinations and character change once and for all.

Psychotherapy methods that can affect orientation

In the last century, psychiatrists tried to "cure" homosexuals with quite worthy methods of influence. In particular, these are:

If, if desired, the patient can work with a psychotherapist and correct their internal attitudes - this may make sense and, first of all, benefit the person with a non-traditional orientation, then drug treatment does not make any sense in such cases.

In the last century, some psychiatrists have tried to treat homosexuality with drugs - with anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and even antipsychotics (which are very serious, addictive drugs with many side effects). Such drugs should be taken not by those people who "sick" with homosexuality, but by people with real mental disorders that make life without taking medications impossible.

Is there a cure for homosexuality?

To date, one can only assume the effectiveness of certain preventive measures against the development of deviations in sexual behavior. One thing is for sure - if a child grows up in a full-fledged family, if he does not regularly observe inappropriate behavior of his parents, does not experience reasons for self-flagellation, is not subjected to ridicule and humiliation from classmates - it can be said with confidence that in the future he is unlikely to suffer from various kinds of sexual deviations.

However, in such a delicate topic, it is impossible to say something for sure. Parents should not in one way or another focus on the topic of homosexuality if they notice feminine traits in the boy's behavior. In some cases this is temporary, in others it is not. One thing is for sure: if the parents, the closest people in a child's life, start to ridicule or punish him for simply trying to be himself, this will lead to his distance. And if a child, for one reason or another, begins to hate his parents, the psychological distance between them increases, then new problems may appear - communication with a bad company and others.

An outstanding psychiatrist of the mid-twentieth century, MD Edmund Bergler wrote 25 books on psychology and 273 articles in leading professional journals. His books cover topics such as child development, neurosis, midlife crises, marital difficulties, gambling, self-destructive behavior, and homosexuality. The following are excerpts from Homosexuality: A Disease or a Way of Life?

“For almost thirty years I have been treating homosexuals, spending many hours with them in the course of their analysis. I can justifiably say that I have no prejudice against homosexuals; to me they are sick people who need medical attention. I have had many therapeutic successes with them, some failures and some disappointments. I am indebted to them for giving me the opportunity to study their mental structure and the genesis and curability of their disease. In general, I have no reason to complain about homosexuals.

However, although I have no prejudice, if I were asked what constitutes a homosexual, I would say: “Homosexuals are inherently rather unpleasant people, regardless of their pleasant or unpleasant external manners. Yes, they are not responsible for their unconscious conflicts, but these conflicts so absorb their internal energy that the shell is a mixture of arrogance, pseudo-aggression and whining. Like all psychic masochists, they cringe when confronted by a stronger person, and when given power, they become ruthless, trampling on a weaker person without the slightest remorse. The only language their unconscious understands is brute force. What is most puzzling is that you rarely find an intact ego (what is commonly called the "right person") among them.

Unsure of my own impressions, I repeatedly tested them with my cured homosexual patients, asking them to sum up their opinions about homosexuals years after the cure. The impressions of their former brethren expressed by the cured homosexuals were deadly criticism, in comparison with which my criticism sounded like childish babble.

The personality of a homosexual is impregnated with a mixture consisting of the following elements:

1. Masochistic provocativeness and collecting injustices.

2. Defensive malice.

3. Frivolity, covering up depression and guilt.

4. Hypernarcissism and hyperarrogance.

5. Refusal to recognize accepted standards in non-sexual matters under the pretext that the right to cut moral corners is due to homosexuals as compensation for their "suffering".

6. Insecurity of a general nature, also of a more or less psychopathic nature.

The most interesting feature of this sextet of qualities is its versatility. Regardless of the level of intelligence, culture, background or education, all homosexuals have it.

INJUSTICE COLLECTOR

Every homosexual is an inveterate collector of injustices and therefore a mental masochist. A psychic masochist is a neurotic who, through his unconscious provocations, creates situations in which he will be astonished, humiliated and rejected.

CONSTANTLY UNSATISFIED, THEREFORE CONSTANTLY IN SEARCH.

The typical homosexual is constantly on the lookout. His "cruising" (homosexual term for seeking a two-minute or, at best, short-term partner) is more extensive than that of a heterosexual neurotic who specializes in one-night stands. According to homosexuals, this proves that they crave variety and have insatiable sexual appetites. In fact, this only proves that homosexuality is a meager and unsatisfactory sexual diet. It also proves the existence of a constant masochistic desire for danger: every time a homosexual cruises, he is at risk of beatings, extortion attempts or venereal diseases.

THE UNFOUNDED MEGALOMANIC BELIEF IN THE SUPERIORITY OF HOMOSEXUALS AND IN THE EVERYWHERE OF HOMOSEXUAL TRENDS.

A megalomaniac outlook on life is another typical sign of a homosexual. He deeply believes in the superiority of his type over all others, and often supports this belief with misunderstood historical examples. At the same time, he is sure that "deep down everyone has some kind of homosexual inclinations."

INTERNAL DEPRESSION AND EXCESSIVE ANGER

Some of the compensatory megalomania of the homosexual does not prevent deep inner depression. Like Napoleon's "scratch a Russian - you will find a Tatar", one could say: "scratch a homosexual - you will find a depressive neurotic." The sometimes ostentatious frivolity of "gays" [literally "jolly"] - homosexuals' term for themselves - is a very subtle pseudo-euphoric camouflage. This is a defense technique against masochistic depression. Another such technique is the exaggerated and uncontrollable malice of homosexuals, which is always ready to be used. This malice is identical to the pseudo-aggression explained in the table:

INTERNAL GUILT ARISING FROM PERVERSION

Without exception, deep inner guilt arising from perversion is present in all homosexuals. This is a displaced guilt, referring to the masochistic substructure. Guilt, whether admitted or denied (usually denied), is an integral part of the homosexual structure. "Mobilizing" this guilt and putting it back in place serves as a means for therapeutic change in psychiatric treatment. Here a distinction must be made between perversion in the psychiatric sense and the popular one: the latter includes a moral connotation, while psychiatric perversion means infantile sex occurring in an adult and leading to orgasm. In short, disease.

IRRATIONAL JEYALY

Homosexuals display an amount of irrational and violent jealousy that is unparalleled in heterosexual relationships. Even in the rare cases of long-term homosexual relationships, there are constant outbursts of jealousy. This pseudo-jealousy covers up deeper repressed conflicts: what on the surface looks like jealousy is in fact an occasion for "collecting injustices." This is especially evident in those cases where an obviously dissolute partner is chosen and fidelity is expected from him.

"UNRELIABILITY" AS AN ELEMENT OF PSYCHOPATIC TRENDS

Insecurity, from inclinations to a pronounced psychopathic trend, is the rule, not the exception, among homosexuals. Living in a conspiratorial atmosphere, they use obscene shortcuts, detours and plots. Sometimes their methods of pressure seem to be borrowed from the dictatorial-criminal environment. Conscious rationalization is simple: "I suffered too much - I can."

“Today the problem of homosexuality is more acute than ten years ago. The perversion has become more widespread due to the artificial creation of new recruits as a result of the dissemination of erroneous statistics. Some personality structures have always been drawn to homosexuality, however, in addition to the usual recruitment, in recent years we have seen a new type of “recruits”. These are young people in their late teens or early twenties - "borderline" homosexuals who sit between two chairs in the decision "to be or not to be". The impetus for homosexuality in this case is provided by the statements of the likes of Kinsey.

Many of these "borderguards" are not true homosexuals: their pseudo-modernism and misplaced experimentation (derived from the misguided belief that homosexuality is "normal and scientifically approved") has unfortunate consequences, burdening them with destructive guilt and self-doubt. This burden persists even after a return to heterosexuality. The tragic and pathetic spectacle of the "statistically induced homosexual" is due to the failure to disseminate simple medical facts."

“Currently, homosexual battles are fought on three fronts:

Homosexuals: "We are normal and demand recognition!"

Heterosexuals: "You perverts and your place in prison!"

Psychiatrists: "Homosexuals are sick people and should be treated."

Influenced by the Kinsey reports, homosexuals have plucked up the courage to actually demand minority status.

As in any transitional period, only half-measures can be proposed. Among them, the most important are:

1. Spreading the knowledge that homosexuality is a neurotic disease in which extremely severe and inevitable self-destructive tendencies cover the whole personality, and that this is not a way of life.

2. Spreading the knowledge that homosexuality is a curable disease.

3. Creation and maintenance of outpatient departments for the treatment of homosexuals, within the existing psychiatric departments in large hospitals, staffed by specially trained psychiatrists.

So far, the fight against homosexuality has been fought through well-intentioned and reasonable moral arguments, and equally necessary legal restrictions. None of these methods proved to be effective. Moral arguments are wasted on homosexuals because, by ignoring conventions, they satisfy their neurotic aggressiveness. Threats of imprisonment are equally useless: the homosexual's typical megalomania allows him to think of himself as an exception, while his subconscious masochistic tendencies make the risk of imprisonment tempting. The only effective way to combat and counteract homosexuality will be to spread the knowledge that there is nothing glamorous about suffering from the disease known as homosexuality. This, at first glance, a sexual disorder, is invariably combined with a serious subconscious self-destruction, which inevitably manifests itself outside the sexual sphere, since it covers the entire personality. The real enemy of the homosexual is not his perversion, but his ignorance that he can be helped, plus his mental masochism that causes him to avoid treatment. This ignorance is artificially supported by homosexual leaders."

“A homosexual of any gender believes that his only problem is the “unjustified attitude” of the environment. He claims that if he were left alone and no longer had to be afraid of the law, social ostracism, extortion or exposure, he could be as "happy" as his heterosexual opposite. This is, of course, a self-consoling illusion. Homosexuality is not a "way of life" as these sick people wrongly believe, but a neurotic distortion of the whole personality. It goes without saying that heterosexuality alone does not guarantee emotional health—and there are countless neurotics among heterosexuals. At the same time, there are healthy heterosexuals, but there are no healthy homosexuals. The whole structure of the personality of a homosexual is permeated with an unconscious desire to suffer. This desire is satisfied by the self-creation of problems, which conveniently falls on the external difficulties faced by the homosexual. If external difficulties were completely removed, and in some circles in large cities they are actually removed - the homosexual will still remain an emotionally sick person.

“Until 10 years ago, the best that science could offer was the reconciliation of the homosexual with his “fate”, in other words, the elimination of conscious guilt. Recent psychiatric experience and research has unequivocally proved that the supposedly irreversible fate of homosexuals (sometimes even attributed to non-existent biological and hormonal conditions) is in fact a therapeutically modifiable subdivision of neurosis. The therapeutic pessimism of the past is gradually disappearing: today psychodynamic psychotherapy can cure homosexuality.”

“Recent books and plays have attempted to portray homosexuals as unfortunate victims who deserve sympathy. The appeal to the lacrimal glands is unreasonable: homosexuals can always resort to psychiatric help and be cured if they only want to. But the ignorance of the public on this issue is so widespread, and the manipulation of public opinion regarding themselves by homosexuals is so effective, that even intelligent people who were definitely not born yesterday fell for their bait.

“In thirty years of practice, I have successfully completed the analysis of one hundred homosexuals (thirty other analyzes were interrupted either by me or by the patient's departure), and have consulted about five hundred. Based on the experience thus gained, I make the positive assertion that homosexuality has an excellent prognosis with psychiatric treatment of the psychodynamic approach, one to two years, at least three sessions per week, provided that the patient really wants to change. That a favorable outcome is not based on any personal variables is supported by the fact that a significant number of colleagues have achieved similar results.”

The homosexual does not reject women, he runs away from them. Unconsciously, he is mortally afraid of them. He runs away from the woman as far as possible, going to the "other continent" - to the man. The typical homosexual belief that he is "indifferent" to women is nothing more than wishful thinking. Inwardly, he hates women with the compensatory hatred of a fear-ridden masochist. This shows up in every analytic discussion with a homosexual patient.

Homosexual appeals to men as an antidote against women. The ascension of a man to the object of attraction is secondary. This attraction is always mixed with contempt. Compared to the typical homosexual's contempt for his sexual partners, the hatred and disdain for women of the most violent heterosexual misogynist looks like benevolence. Often the whole personality of the "lover" is erased. Many homosexual encounters take place in toilets, in the obscurity of parks and Turkish baths, where the sex object is not even visible. Such impersonal means of achieving "contact" make visiting a heterosexual brothel seem like an emotional experience.

It is striking how high the proportion of psychopathic personalities among homosexuals is. In simple terms, many homosexuals carry the stigma of insecurity. In psychoanalysis, this insecurity is considered part of the oral nature of homosexuals. These people always create and provoke situations in which they feel unfairly disadvantaged. This sense of injustice, which is experienced and perpetuated by their own behavior, gives them an inner right to be constantly pseudo-aggressive and hostile towards their environment, and self-pity masochistically. It is this vindictive tendency that the non-psychological but observant outside world calls the "insecurity" and ingratitude of homosexuals. It is equally striking how large the proportion of homosexuals among swindlers, pseudologists, counterfeiters, delinquents of all kinds, drug dealers, gamblers, spies, pimps, brothel owners, etc. is.

For almost thirty years I have been treating homosexuals, spending many hours with them in the course of their analysis. I can justifiably say that I have no prejudice against homosexuals; to me they are sick people who need medical attention. I have had many therapeutic successes with them, some failures and some disappointments. I am indebted to them for giving me the opportunity to study their mental structure and the genesis and curability of their disease. In general, I have no reason to complain about homosexuals.

However, while I have no prejudice, if I were asked what constitutes a homosexual, I would say that homosexuals are inherently rather unpleasant people, regardless of their pleasant or unpleasant external manners. Yes, they are not responsible for their unconscious conflicts, but these conflicts so absorb their internal energy that their outer shell is a mixture of arrogance, pseudo-aggression and whining. Like all psychic masochists, they cringe when confronted by a stronger person, and when given power, they become ruthless, trampling on a weaker person without the slightest remorse. The only language their unconscious understands is brute force. What is most puzzling is that you rarely find an intact ego (what is commonly called the "right person") among them.

Unsure of my own impressions, I repeatedly tested them with my cured homosexual patients, asking them to summarize their opinions about homosexuals years after the cure. The impressions of my former associates, expressed by cured homosexuals, were deadly criticism, in comparison with which my analysis sounded like childish babble.

The personality of a homosexual is impregnated with a mixture consisting of the following elements:

Masochistic provocativeness and collecting injustices.
Defensive malice.
Frivolity covering depression and guilt.
Hypernarcissism and hyperarrogance.
Refusal to recognize accepted standards in non-sexual matters under the pretext that the right to cut moral corners is due to homosexuals as compensation for their "suffering".
Insecurity of a general nature, also of a more or less psychopathic nature.

The most interesting feature of this sextet of qualities is its versatility. Regardless of the level of intelligence, culture, background or education, all homosexuals have it.

INJUSTICE COLLECTOR

CONSTANTLY UNSATISFIED, THEREFORE CONSTANTLY IN SEARCH

UNFOUNDED MEGALOMANIC BELIEF IN THE SUPERIORITY OF HOMOSEXUALS AND IN THE ubiquity of HOMOSEXUAL TRENDS

A megalomaniac outlook on life is another typical sign of a homosexual. He deeply believes in the superiority of his type over all others, and often supports this belief with misunderstood historical examples. At the same time, he is sure that “deep down everyone has some kind of homosexual inclinations.

INTERNAL DEPRESSION AND EXCESSIVE ANGER

INTERNAL GUILT ARISING FROM PERVERSION

IRRATIONAL JEYALY

"UNRELIABILITY" AS AN ELEMENT OF PSYCHOPATIC TRENDS

Today the problem of homosexuality is more acute than ten years ago. The perversion has become more widespread due to the artificial creation of new recruits as a result of the dissemination of erroneous statistics. Some personality structures have always been drawn to homosexuality, however, in addition to the usual recruitment, in recent years we have seen a new type of “recruits”. These are young people in their late teens or early twenties - "borderline" homosexuals who sit between two chairs in the decision "to be or not to be". The impetus for homosexuality in this case is provided by the statements of the likes of Kinsey. Many of these "borderguards" are not true homosexuals: their pseudo-modernism and misplaced experimentation (derived from the misguided belief that homosexuality is "normal and scientifically approved") has unfortunate consequences, burdening them with destructive guilt and self-doubt. This burden persists even after a return to heterosexuality. The tragic and pathetic spectacle of the "statistically induced homosexual" is due to the failure to disseminate simple medical facts.

A new and by no means limited source of marital tragedy has been the marriage of so-called “bisexuals” to unsuspecting women, whose fates are ruined when they discover that they are not wives, but a front ... “Bisexuality” exists only as a flattering description of a homosexual, retaining a slight vestige of heterosexuality, which for a while makes him capable of passionless intercourse, giving him the necessary internal alibi. No one can dance at two weddings at the same time, not even the most skilled homosexual. There is no equal distribution of libidinal drives between homosexuality and heterosexuality, simply because homosexuality is not a sexual drive but a defense mechanism. The so-called "bisexuals" are in fact true homosexuals with a slight admixture of potency in relation to unloved women. When a homosexual of this order marries an unsuspecting woman, the perversion of the husband is inevitable and tragic. "Bisexual" marriages are motivated by social causes or by the naive belief that marriage will teach them normality. Previously, such marriages were rare; they are now the rule.

Homosexual battles are currently being waged on three fronts:
Homosexuals: "We are normal and demand recognition!"
Heterosexuals: "You perverts and your place in prison!"
Psychiatrists: "Homosexuals are sick people and should be treated."
Influenced by the Kinsey reports, homosexuals have plucked up the courage to actually demand minority status. As in any transitional period, only half-measures can be proposed. Among them, the most important are:

Spreading the knowledge that homosexuality is a neurotic disease in which extremely severe and inevitable self-destructive tendencies cover the whole personality, and that it is not a way of life.
Spreading the knowledge that homosexuality is a curable disease.
Creation and maintenance of outpatient departments for the treatment of homosexuals, within the existing psychiatric departments in large hospitals, staffed by specially trained psychiatrists.

Until now, the fight against homosexuality has been fought through well-intentioned and reasonable moral arguments and equally necessary legal restrictions. None of these methods proved to be effective. Moral arguments are wasted on homosexuals because, by ignoring conventions, they satisfy their neurotic aggressiveness. Threats of imprisonment are equally useless: the homosexual's typical megalomania allows him to think of himself as an exception, while his subconscious masochistic tendencies make the risk of imprisonment tempting. The only effective way to combat and counteract homosexuality will be to spread the knowledge that there is nothing glamorous about suffering from the disease known as homosexuality. This, at first glance, a sexual disorder, is invariably combined with a serious subconscious self-destruction, which inevitably manifests itself outside the sexual sphere, since it covers the entire personality. The real enemy of the homosexual is not his perversion, but his ignorance that he can be helped, plus his mental masochism that makes him avoid treatment. This ignorance is artificially supported by homosexual leaders.

A homosexual of either sex believes that his only problem is the "unjustified attitude" of the environment. He claims that if he were left alone and no longer had to fear the law, social ostracism, extortion, or exposure, he could be as "happy" as his heterosexual opposite. This is, of course, a self-consoling illusion. Homosexuality is not a "way of life" as these sick people unreasonably believe, but a neurotic distortion of the whole personality. It goes without saying that heterosexuality alone does not guarantee emotional health—and there are countless neurotics among heterosexuals. At the same time, there are healthy heterosexuals, but there are no healthy homosexuals. The whole structure of the personality of a homosexual is permeated with an unconscious desire to suffer. This desire is satisfied by the self-creation of problems, which conveniently falls on the external difficulties faced by the homosexual. If external difficulties were completely removed, and in some circles in large cities they are actually removed, the homosexual will still remain an emotionally ill person.

Even 10 years ago, the best that science could offer was the reconciliation of the homosexual with his "fate", in other words, the elimination of conscious guilt. Recent psychiatric experience and research has unequivocally proved that the supposedly irreversible fate of homosexuals (sometimes even attributed to non-existent biological and hormonal conditions) is in fact a therapeutically modifiable subdivision of neurosis. The therapeutic pessimism of the past is gradually disappearing: today psychodynamic psychotherapy can cure homosexuality.

In recent books and plays, attempts have been made to portray homosexuals as unfortunate victims who deserve sympathy. The appeal to the lacrimal glands is unreasonable: homosexuals can always resort to psychiatric help and be cured if they only want to. But the ignorance of the public on this issue is so widespread, and the manipulation of public opinion regarding themselves by homosexuals is so effective, that even intelligent people who were definitely not born yesterday fell for their bait.

“In thirty years of practice, I have successfully completed the analysis of one hundred homosexuals (thirty other analyzes were interrupted either by me or by the patient's departure), and have consulted about five hundred. Based on the experience thus gained, I can say with confidence that homosexuality has an excellent prognosis with psychiatric treatment of the psychodynamic approach for one to two years, at least three sessions per week, provided that the patient really wants to change. That a favorable outcome is not based on any personal variables is supported by the fact that a significant number of colleagues have achieved similar results.

Homosexuality is often combined with psychopathic tendencies. Homosexuality itself has nothing to do with psychopathy - the combination occurs due to a general oral regression. On the surface, psychopathic acts are vengeful fantasies, but behind this thinly veiled palimpsest lie deep self-destructive tendencies that a broad, pseudo-aggressive façade cannot hide.

The combination of homosexuality with fraud, addiction to gambling, alcoholism, drug addiction, kleptomania is a common occurrence.

Lesbianism

The genesis of female homosexuality is identical to male: an unresolved masochistic conflict with the mother of early infancy. In the oral phase of development (the first 1.5 years of life), the beginning lesbian goes through a series of difficult ups and downs with her mother, which prevent the successful completion of this phase. The peculiarity of the clinical lesbian conflict is that it represents an unconscious three-layer structure: a masochistic “gathering of injustices”, which is covered with pseudo-hatred, which is covered with exaggerated pseudo-love for the representative of the infantile image of the mother (neurotics are only capable of ersatz emotions and!).

The lesbian is a neurotic with a triad of unconscious concealment leading to a rather tragicomic quip pro quo, a prank on the naive observer. First, lesbianism, paradoxically, is not erotic but aggressive conflict: the basis of the oral-regressed neurotic is an unresolved aggressive conflict that boomerangs back because of guilt and only secondarily. Secondly, under the guise of a “husband and wife” relationship, there is a neurotically charged relationship between child and mother. Thirdly, lesbianism gives the impression of a biological fact; the naive observer is blinded by their conscious enjoyment, while beneath it lies a treatable neurosis.

The outside world, in its ignorance, considers lesbians to be courageous women. However, not every courageous woman is homosexual. On the other hand, an outwardly masculine lesbian who imitates men in clothing, behavior and relationships is only showing camouflage that hides her real conflict. Blinded by this lesbian-fueled scotoma, the bewildered observer is unable to explain the "passive" lesbian or the fact that lesbian sexual practices, in an infantile direction, are centered primarily around cunnilingus and breast sucking, and mutual dildo masturbation is centered around the clitoris, unconsciously identified with pacifier.

My 30 years of clinical experience has shown that lesbianism has five levels:
1) masochistic attachment to mother;
2) a veto of inner conscience that prohibits "pleasure from displeasure";
3) the first defense is pseudo-hatred;
4) a second veto of inner conscience, vetoing hatred of any kind towards the mother;
5) the second defense is pseudo-love.

Thus, lesbianism is not "female love for a woman", but the pseudo-love of a masochistic woman who has created an internal alibi that she consciously does not understand.
This defensive structure in lesbianism explains:
a. Why lesbians are characterized by great tension and pathological jealousy. In the inner reality, this type of jealousy is nothing but a source for the masochistic "collection of injustices."
b. Why violent hatred, sometimes expressed in physical attacks, is so thinly hidden in homosexual relationships. The layer of pseudo-love (fifth layer) is only a protection that covers.
in. Why lesbians resort to oedipal camouflage (a farce of husband and wife) - it masks the masochistic relationship between mother and child, rooted in pre-oedipal conflicts, heavily burdened with guilt.
G. Why it is useless to expect satisfactory human relationships within lesbianism. The lesbian unconsciously seeks constant masochistic pleasure, so she is incapable of conscious happiness.

The narcissistic substructure of lesbians also explains why the infantile conflict with the mother never goes away. In normal development, the conflict with the mother is resolved by the girl through splitting: the old “hatred” remains with the mother, the “love” component shifts to the father, and instead of the “child-mother” duality (), a triangular oedipal situation “child-mother-father” arises. The would-be lesbian tries to do the same, only to be thrown back into the original conflict. The oedipal "solution" (itself a transitional phase that the child gives up in the course of its normal development) is that lesbians use the husband-wife (father-mother) disguise as a protective cover.

It is necessary to distinguish between two forms of unconscious identification: "leading" (leading) and "leading" (misleading). The first represents the repressed desires of the personality crystallized into the end result of infantile conflict, and the second refers to identification with people who are chosen to deny and reject the reproaches of the inner conscience directed against these neurotic desires. The “leading” identification in the active type of lesbian refers to the mother, and the “leading” one to the oedipal father. In the passive type, the "leading" identification refers to the child, and the "leading" one refers to the mother. All of the above, of course, is based on clinical evidence.

Conversation on this topic with psychiatrist Mark Zuckerman

In Ukraine, there is discrimination against sexual minorities, drug addicts and representatives of the sex industry who live in the country. Olivier Adam, coordinator of the UN system in Ukraine, stated this in an interview with the Zerkalo Nedeli newspaper. “We were, for example, very concerned about three bills submitted to the Verkhovna Rada to ban propaganda of homosexuality. We believe this violates human rights,” said Mr. Adam. In his opinion, drug addicts, men who have sex with other men, and representatives of the sex industry are the most discriminated against in Ukraine.

He emphasized that these groups are most often at risk of HIV/AIDS. “If we do not prevent the use of this 'prevention system' for these three groups, then we - the UN, non-governmental organizations, the private sector and public authorities - will fail in the fight against tuberculosis and counter the spread of HIV / AIDS," the UN representative said. Here is what psychiatrist Mark Zuckerman thinks about homosexuality.

One of the main questions in the topic of homosexuality is whether this phenomenon is natural, natural for some people or their voluntary delusion, which should be fought. Supporters of the first point of view today give many different theses in defense of the rights of those who prefer relationships with members of their own sex. In particular, one can often hear that homosexuality is natural insofar as not only a certain part of people, but also a certain part of animals are subject to it. And, consequently, both animals and people related to homosexuals simply follow the program laid down in them by nature, and, therefore, there is nothing reprehensible in this. What do you think about this?

To solve any complex problem, one should separate conjectures and hypotheses from scientific facts. It is one thing - the observations and assumptions of the inhabitants, and quite another - the results of serious, impartial and objective research. Bias in judgments on this issue is always in excess. This is especially true of "scientific" publications in the media that sympathize with homosexual relationships. Meanwhile, objective scientific studies have shown that the so-called "homosexual relationships" observed in the communities of some animals, for the most part, represent nothing more than a ritual form of behavior. Simply put, behind the "homosexual" behavior of animals lies a set of actions in which the dominant male demonstrates to the other male "who is in charge here." Scientists call such behavior sociosexual, although there is no sex here either - just a "show-off", an imitation of sexual intercourse. Because all the characteristic movements made by the dominant male can only be an imitation: real sexual contact between animals of the same sex is simply impossible, even for purely physiological and anatomical reasons. This is what concerns some adult animals, mainly primates.

There is another reason why animals can behave contrary to the laws of nature: when they are forced to do so by harsh circumstances, such as imprisonment in zoos or simply being in captivity with individuals of only their own sex. And the inadequate behavior of the “green” young animals, which are just beginning to enter puberty (like, for example, dog puppies), is, of course, due to their underdevelopment and absolute misunderstanding of “what’s what and why.” They are under the influence of suddenly awakened instincts and try to follow them, not yet knowing exactly how and when exactly this should be done. This is almost uncommon for adult dogs. Exceptional cases are the long absence of the female. But I want to say that, in my opinion, not a single baboon would agree with classifying him as a homosexual. Indeed, in any even the most unintelligent baboon, it is laid down how you can and should continue your race, and in this respect he looks much wiser than a huge number of homosexuals from among people.

Here it is - practically the main slogan of the moment for the whole country ...

Charles Socarides, in his book Homosexuality and Freedom Went Too Far, writes: “Firstly, the term homosexuality can only be applied to the human race, since in animals the researcher can observe only motor reactions. As soon as he begins to invent some kind of motivation, he “imposes” human psychodynamics on the animal and embarks on a very risky, slippery path. Secondly, assumptions about the origin of human homosexuality cannot be based on genetic studies, the study of the hypothalamus, the anterior commissure or lower brain structures, or the study of species such as Drosophila and even lower primates, because humans (unlike animals) have the ability to talk about motivation, conscious or unconscious, but always of great importance for building a model of gender-role behavior and choosing a sexual object. Below the level of the chimpanzee, sexual desire arises absolutely automatically reflexively. One of the most eminent animal behaviorists, the famous ethologist Beech, conducted a comparative study (1942-1947) of sexual development during the evolution of vertebrates and made a startling discovery. He found that in the lower vertebrates, sexual behavior is determined almost automatically and is a self-regulating sequence of events. In the course of development, in connection with the formation of the brain, stereotyped behavior disappears: the act of copulation becomes less and less automated, and more and more dependent on the individual experience of the animal. At the chimpanzee level, only three absolutely instinctive mechanisms remain: erection, pelvic ejection, and orgasm. Based on these three mechanisms, a man builds his sexual behavior under the influence of the cerebral cortex. So don't give them wishful thinking. Homosexuality is a deviation from the normal program, tending to zero in nature. Only in the environment of human society this deviation has a chance to exist. If only because the human psyche, due to its enormous complexity and subtlety, is a very unstable thing and can also create not such “miracles”. Because of this, the tendency to various perversions is a predominantly human feature. Animals that are guided exclusively by rational instincts, which are inherent in them by nature, are not prone to such vices.

But isn't homosexuality in this case a congenital deviation or an innate feature of a person? What does science say about this?

The opinion of science on this issue is still full of disputes and disagreements. Although homosexuals themselves are inclined to claim that their non-traditional sexual orientation is caused by some biological patterns that are not subject to mind control, all the scientific research conducted over the years has not been able to fully confirm any of the many biological theories of the origin of homosexuality. Such theories include such as hormonal, genetic, constitutional, the theory of organic brain damage, neuroendocrine, endocrine, prenatal, anthropological and many others. It should be noted that the scientific studies undertaken to prove these theories and, accordingly, to prove the naturalness of homosexuality, are very contradictory and insufficiently substantiated. Sometimes they were carried out not objectively enough, or even simply in bad faith, so that they were later refuted by opponents. There are good reasons to believe that at least some of the authors of these theories were, for one reason or another, interested in obtaining evidence of the biological nature of homosexuality. The reason is that their research was carried out already in the conditions of the "sexual revolution" and the widespread propaganda of the liberalization of this phenomenon, which is gaining strength and power. And biological predetermination would give the “victims of the mistake of nature” both an excuse for their own immorality and the opportunity to defend for themselves a multitude of rights and privileges. So, in the early 1990s, the American neuroscientist and part-time homosexual Simon LeVay conducted experiments on autopsy of the brain of homosexual men who died of AIDS. He found that in these patients, one of the small groups of cells at the base of the brain is three times smaller than in heterosexuals, and equal in size to women! Other scientists could not object to him at that time only because they were more busy solving the problem of AIDS itself. However, later, some scientists, in particular the psychiatrist and neurophysiologist William Bine, already confidently insist that the presence of a correlation between brain anatomy and genetic factors on the one hand, and sexual orientation on the other, does not at all indicate the existence of a causal relationship between these phenomena. Here is what he writes in one of his articles: “All the evidence currently available that homosexuality is due to innate biological traits is untenable. Genetic research inevitably suffers from the disadvantage that it is usually impossible to separate the influence of biological factors from the influence of the environment, as a result of which all attempts to study the heritability of psychological traits come to a standstill. Neurobiological research is based on dubious hypotheses about the existence of differences between the brain of a man and the brain of a woman. The biological mechanisms that are offered as an explanation for male homosexuality often cannot be generalized to account for the existence of lesbians (who are generally under-researched). The fact that, by their nature, most biological variables are continuous is not consistent with the paucity of adult bisexuals that most surveys show.”

Ugliness raised to normal: an American soldier returned to the "wife" who was waiting for him from the war ...

Charles Socarides, an honorary member of the American Psychiatric Association, is another expert who disputes the recognition of homosexuality as a biological innate feature. His work on the subject constitutes a classic of psychology. This scientist claims that homosexuality depends mainly on interaction with the environment, and an innate predisposition to this is completely excluded. One way or another, but all the currently available evidence that homosexuality is due to biological factors is untenable. No one has been able to prove a person's innate predisposition to homosexual behavior.

All this sounds rather complicated and incomprehensible to people who are not biologists. Are there simpler and clearer explanations?

My explanation for the failure of the biological theory of the origin of homosexuality is quite simple. Man as a biological species has changed little over the millennia. Its hormonal, genetic, constitutional, neuroendocrine, endocrine systems function almost invariably for centuries. For centuries, people have received organic brain lesions, for centuries there have been prenatal disorders. But look how the number of homosexuals correlates with the state of peoples in different historical periods of their history. Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome during their dawn practically did not know homosexuality. Meanwhile, in the later periods of the history of these civilizations, during the decline of these empires, there is a flourishing of the culture of homosexuality. Also in the Middle Ages of Europe, homosexuality practically did not manifest itself, and during the period of the so-called Renaissance, it again flourished.

In Russia, the almost complete absence of pronounced homosexuality can be observed until the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century. By this time, homosexuality had spread mainly among liberals and revolutionaries. The heyday of homosexuality in Russia occurred after the revolution and continued until the 1930s. The revolutionaries, among whom there were a huge number of homosexuals, lifted the ban on same-sex intercourse, which existed under the king. And this blue bacchanalia (one of the symbols of which was the “innocently” repressed Meyerhold) continued until the mid-1930s, when it was severely stopped. And then homosexuality became widespread only at the present time. How can this be related to biology? After all, if this phenomenon were explained biologically, then the number of homosexuals would always be the same, and not differ hundreds of times depending on the political, geographical, spiritual, historical situation.

Even the cats are interested...

Could homosexuality be an evolutionarily conditioned program? Like, is homosexuality a new, higher level of human development?

If we carefully consider the principles of intraspecific evolution (and there are a lot of questions with the general theory of evolution), then it becomes obvious that individuals with deviations within the species are gradually culled out. Statistics and the science of bionics are good proof of this. Biologists are well aware that in nature most of the "marriage" is rejected in the first generation. Obviously, homosexuality is a dead end not only from a moral point of view, but also from the point of view of elementary procreation. Just intraspecific evolution fundamentally could not allow such a stupid "waste" in the animal world.

It is surprising that people of homosexual orientation, convinced that homosexuality is an integral part of nature, are ready to stand on the same level of development with monkeys, dogs and worms, if only to justify the naturalness of their “free choice”.

Attempts to justify themselves are just not surprising. Self-justification is much more natural for a person and much more understandable than homosexuality. Those for whom the example of animals is an argument in choosing a model of their own behavior should think about the fact that animals do a lot of things that are hardly acceptable even for most homosexuals, for example, go naked, defecate wherever they want, sleep in the open. etc.

- Many scientists have held and continue to hold the view that homosexuality is a mental illness. Is it so?

This opinion of scientists was the very first and main theory that explained homosexuality, and it was formed in world medicine a century and a half ago. But homosexuals themselves never wanted to admit they were sick, so discussions and isolated conflicts on this issue gradually developed into mass protests. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1992 excluded homosexuality from the list of psychiatric diagnoses. Since then, we can assume that such a mental illness in the world, including Russia, does not exist. On what basis did this happen? It's just that WHO followed the example of "enlightened" America. In this case, the American Psychiatric Association (APA). As early as 1973, the APA excluded homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistical Handbook (DSM). Although they also had no scientific arguments and clinical evidence, there were no valid reasons that would justify such a change in the position of medicine in relation to homosexuality. Everything happened after a series of scandalous actions organized by numerous crowds of homosexuals. A political campaign unfolded, and under its pressure the Association was forced to yield. Homosexuality has been recognized as a normal alternative way of life, and after the "cultural revolution" and various changes in legislation, it "proudly walks the planet." Although it is clear to every more or less sane person: homosexual relations cannot be the norm, because they are not only unnatural, but also sinful. And if a person has such an unnatural craving, then it is connected either with the pathology of the body or with the pathology of the soul. Or maybe both of them together. Only now rarely any of the homosexuals wants to be treated. They do not want to admit that they are sick, but on the contrary, they loudly prove their normality, calling the rest of the society of people abnormal.

It must be said that American psychiatrists protested against this arbitrariness as best they could, but the forces were very unequal. Five years after the APA decided to remove "homosexuality" from the Directory, a vote was taken among 10,000 APA American psychiatrists. Bottom line: 68% of the psychiatrists who filled out the questionnaire still considered homosexuality to be a mental disorder. So there seems to be such a disease, but it seems to be non-existent. Another paradox is that those few who want to get rid of their homosexual orientation cannot now receive the necessary treatment. Although there is an experience of healing - there are people who managed to start a new life and build a normal family.

The struggle for equality began so beautifully. And what happened...

What is wrong with homosexuality? After all, homosexual relationships usually arise at the mutual desire of adults who are sure that these relationships bring them pleasure.

Let's look at this situation using an example ... oddly enough, pans. It is clear that it is intended for cooking. Using it instead of a chamber pot is stupidity. Putting on like a motorcycle helmet is also a dubious matter. Some put an alarm clock in it to ring louder in the morning. However, this is definitely not the main purpose of the pan! So is our reproductive system. It is designed to be used for a specific purpose. Naturally, the primary cause of copulation is the continuation of the genus and population, that is, the birth of children (and getting pleasure is just a secondary goal). The reproductive system was given to us not for perverted pleasures, but for a specific purpose. Gays also make this mechanism flawed from a biological and social point of view. In addition, I am surprised by the fact that although homosexuals do not like to call their dubious inclinations a disease, but at the same time, when it comes to the painfulness of homosexuality, they consider this disease incurable. Say, they would like to recover, but they cannot. Interestingly, has anyone seen gays who stand in orderly queues to doctors and ask to cure them? When a person, for example, learns that he has cancer, he rushes headlong to the doctor. He is ready to go under the knife, pay a lot of money, undergo radiation therapy, lie in the hospital for months (in general, do whatever is necessary to survive). What about gay people? How do they want to be cured? Where are they being treated? What do they even do for their healing? .. I know that there are rehabilitation centers for alcoholics and drug addicts. But I have not yet heard about the centers in which homosexuality is treated. In fact, I am sure that these people do not want to be treated for this passion of theirs. Moreover, I can say that the vast majority of them do not consider their deviation from the norm as a disease. On the contrary, they consider themselves unique, special, unlike others.

- Are there any other - non-biological - hypotheses that explain the emergence and course of homosexuality?

Yes, there are quite a few of them too. Their difference from biological theories is that in the emergence of homosexuality they all imply some kind of postnatal (occurred after birth) events. In other words, these are hypotheses of “acquired homosexuality”. The reasons for such a consequence, for example, include: problems in the parental family, distortions in sex education, lifestyle features, negative sexual experience, seduction in childhood, and others. All this is a negative influence of the surrounding reality. But, apparently, these most unfavorable factors are not enough for people, and one more one is being intensively added to all of them - the most dangerous one: mass propaganda of homosexuality as a “normal phenomenon and free choice”. Already now the number of people of “non-traditional orientation” is growing incredibly under the influence of this propaganda, but what will happen next? Although they say that it is easier to prevent than to cure ... One of the striking examples that testify in favor of non-biological hypotheses is Boris Moiseev, who, without hiding, said in one of his interviews that his mother was expecting a girl, that he was wearing bows and dress...

The crisis of men led them to the camp of "women" ...

If non-traditional sexual orientation is often caused by improper upbringing, as in the example of Boris Moiseev, then this bias can certainly be cured with the help of psychologists, if not suppressed on your own?

Yes, many say that tendencies towards homosexuality are laid down in early childhood due to pedagogical neglect or due to the absence of one of the parents. But if you agree that you became a homosexual because of the mistakes or defects of your upbringing, then it means that you recognize yourself as a moral monster, and then why do you strive in every possible way to demonstrate this “inferiority” of yours, why are you not ashamed of it? You can draw an analogy between gay people and cancer cells. The presence of both the first and the second indicates an incorrect development, in the first case - of society, in the second - of the organism. The presence of malignant cells harms the entire body. Gays and homosexuals resemble cancer cells also because they also gather in groups, unite in conglomerates. The tumor cannot exist in individual cells, otherwise the immune system will calculate and destroy them. Therefore, in order to survive, cancer cells exist in groups, and deceive the immune surveillance cells. They develop to such an extent that the upper layers of cells begin to put pressure on the lower ones and crush them. As a result, a rotting slurry is obtained, which poisons the body, the so-called tumor intoxication develops. This is a direct analogy with the "blue mafia".

How tough are you...

Such is the reality. One can sympathize with disease, but one cannot sympathize with the desire to infect others. Where did you see other sick people or people with some kind of congenital features (for example, deaf, blind, dwarfs, etc.) parading thousands of people through the streets of cities? Why do people with incontinence, nocturnal enuresis, cancer patients, diabetics not arrange parades? What do homosexuals want to say to society with their parades? That they carry their title with pride? (They themselves call their events not parades, but prides, from the word “pride” - pride, a flock.) Is it not enough for them that they completely occupied 1 TV channel and the entire show business, and they want even more influence?

- Are there any data proving the influence of propaganda on the number of people with a homosexual orientation?

The trouble is that most people do not realize the seriousness and danger of such an influence. Active propaganda in the media, when same-sex "couples in love" are served as an example of fashion and sophistication, is doing its dirty work: the number of "fans" of this vice is growing year by year. Here is a quote from Sergei Valtsev's book "The Decline of Humanity": "Homosexuals actively infect other members of society with their disease, especially children. For example, in Los Angeles there is the Rene Gougnon Society, which operates under the motto "Sex starts at 8 years old, otherwise it will be too late." The purpose of this organization is to legalize sexual relations between adults and children. The North American Men and Boys Love Association advocates for the rights of adults to have sex with adolescents. She calls it “intergenerational sex”: “Children have the right to choose their own partners; the value of sex is determined by the quality of the relationship, not by age; most pedophiles are harmless, kind people; The damage from pedophilia comes not from the sex itself, but from the negative reaction of the parents.” Further more. In Holland, the homosexual lobby has already passed a law allowing sex between an adult and a 12-year-old child (!) with the consent of the latter. And how much does an adult need to seduce a minor with something? Therefore, one should not think that perverts will live an isolated life. No, they have long been imposing their worldview on society, using all available methods to promote their views among children and adolescents.

And the difference seems to be...

- The film "Brokeback Mountain" received an Oscar, pharmacies sell special products intended for homosexual sex, in stores there is a bulk of literature on this topic ... The abundance of objects and materials related to homosexual culture in our daily life is no longer shocking, they have become part of our culture and do not cause rejection ...

- All this became possible thanks to the washing of our brains through the media. Hundreds of young men are converted to homosexual faith through instilled tolerance... And if there are specific methods of combating leprosy and cholera, then there is no cure here... I'm talking about material means of treatment. However, there are spiritual medicines - moral education according to the commandments, for example. I have seen people recover from their homosexual addiction. But it should be noted that these were not inveterate homosexuals, but people who are in a borderline state, who are bisexual, for example (as they say, "both yours and ours"). Subsequently, they left the "blue" groups. The treatment took place through repentance, through inner work on one's soul. After all, I repeat, homosexuality is a passion, and passion is a disease of the soul, and it is she who needs to be treated first of all ...

The end follows.

Prepared by Ivan Petrenko based on Internet materials