Killer wallpaper, poisonous water and seductive chair. How to survive in your own apartment download fb2. How to survive in your own apartment: an excerpt from the new book by Daria Sargsyan Killer wallpapers

26.10.2021

At the age of 20, I decided to donate blood. I thought, why not. I passed, and everything somehow turned out by itself - I became a volunteer and began to go to the oncohematological department of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital. There I saw quite a few problems - and this despite the fact that the Podari Zhizn Foundation tried to plug all the holes to the maximum. And since I was in my senior year of journalism, I worked, I wanted to write about it. She proposed the topic of bone marrow transplantation to Esquire magazine, and the editors gave the go-ahead. , became one of my first medical texts.

At the same time, I decided to take advantage of the fact that my studak had not yet been taken away from me, and began to attend lectures at other universities and other departments of Moscow State University. Across the street from the faculty of journalism there are several departments of the First Honey, where I also started to go. I really liked the logic of the structure of the body, the logic of the structure of diseases. At school biology lessons were not so fun and clear. And it quickly became clear that there is a huge problem in medicine: there is no mutual understanding between doctors and patients - they are very angry with each other (despite the fact that there is either no reason for this at all, or everything can be easily fixed by just talking). And as a journalist, I could help change the situation a little. In addition, after the faculty of journalism, I began to feel sick from the humanities - I took up medical journalism, in which you can rely on cool sources and where there is not much room for a subjective attitude on the part of the author.

Conscientiousness, meticulousness and curiosity are, perhaps, the main qualities of a medical journalist. Here you just need to sit on the priest exactly every day, read a lot, look for confirmation of each fact and torment doctors with endless questions. Pretty tedious work, by and large. Yes, you constantly learn a lot of new and useful things, you go to places where outsiders are not allowed in hospitals, but basically this is a routine job. Probably, the life of a special correspondent or a sports journalist is much more fun and unpredictable.

However, for me personally, the most difficult thing is not the routine, but the incompetence of many colleagues. I hate to talk about it, because it always sounds like "everyone is an idiot, and I'm d'Artagnan", but there are really a lot of illiterate articles. And every time I see material without a single reference to sources about the fact that from the age of 30 you need to do an ultrasound of the mammary glands every year, or that acne occurs due to problems with the intestines, or that multivitamins are necessary for everyone, I want to “kill” . Probably because it is to some extent personal: a kind of war in the information space - I am trying to tell one thing, and colleagues, for some reason, contribute to the spread of obscurantism. And it's very painful to see. After all, they probably act without malicious intent and sometimes do not even understand that they are harming. This makes the fight even more ridiculous.

The main problem is not when the article says that this or that disease is treated with soda and urine (it seems to me that many people already understand that this is nonsense), but when it is written that you need to use certain drugs with solid names and for diagnosis to do a certain tomography, but if you look at it, it turns out that these are just bad recommendations. Ideally, of course, to protect yourself from this, you need to look for information in English and only on trusted sites. It's basically , and . Now there are a bunch of extensions that help you translate individual words, sentences, or the entire text on the page. And pretty good quality. Yes, this, of course, complicates reading, but in essence, you just need to get used to it.

If I now list the minimum requirements for a good article, then I don’t know where you can find something in Russian that even remotely resembles or . Firstly, there should be links to high-quality sources (read: at least English-language, because English is the language of modern medicine). Secondly, there should be a date: when the article was published and (ideally) when it is going to be updated. In medicine, everything is changing very quickly, and, for example, a 2011 article on the treatment of hepatitis C will already be. Plus, over time, you will learn to identify marker words that betray the author’s poor work. This, for example, is already rather boring. To get some basic patient education and figure things out quickly, one can read everything.

I have two favorite friends with whom we make Namochi Mantu - Marianna Mirzoyan and Karina Nazaretyan (jokes about the Armenian mafia have long been joked). At one time, we agreed precisely because we were unbearably meticulous. This does not mean that we do not make mistakes - we make mistakes because we are people, but in general our approach is the same and it helps to give reliable information in articles.

I mostly read Russian-language articles on medical topics on Telegram and Facebook (with the exception of ). This, for example, is the telegram channel "" of medical journalist Olya Kashubina,. On Facebook, I read pediatricians Sergei Butriy, Fedor Katasonov and infectious disease specialist Evgeny Shcherbina. The gynecologist Tatyana Rumyantseva also has her own. There are also many good doctors on Instagram, but I still can’t figure out how to use this terribly inconvenient resource for reading texts.

It seems to me that, in principle, an ordinary person should not be aware of the latest research. I'll explain now. If you just love science, read on. If you want to apply this knowledge in practice, then no - in Russian, I can’t recommend anything like that. Usually in news publications, it's all sorts of slag like "Carrots save you from Alzheimer's disease" - you open it, and there is a study on mice or a study in which they found a correlation, not a causal relationship. Even if the study is good, there are still 283 studies on the topic that no one canceled. And you just have to go to , where articles are updated every month, to find out how this 284th study has affected the big picture. There is, of course, - everything is about evidence-based medicine, but this is not a large media outlet that does everything quickly and on all fronts.

It seems to me that the low level of health education in Russia is directly related to laziness and a lack of understanding that you yourself are responsible for your health. Here you have a headache, you go to the pharmacy, you say: "Give me something for the head." You are given some kind of combination drug, such as Citramon. Accepted - helped. Then the head hurt again - you took it again. And if this happens often, you earn yourself an abuse headache, that is, pain directly due to taking painkillers. And all because you took a simple path, considered that the pharmacist is responsible for your health, and not you yourself. I understand, of course, I would like to live in a world where everyone does their job well and you can outsource a lot of things, but the reality is that only the person himself can be responsible for his health. And it's difficult.

Probably, if we had such cool Russian-language sources as or, it would be easier. But in the States and in other English-speaking countries, people are treated with echinacea and homeopathic remedies.

It is difficult, of course, to talk about the reasons why many people, in case of malaise, do not want to go to the doctor or go to the clinic until the very end, but, most likely, the fact is that: a) you will certainly encounter rudeness - “how should I know, where is your card”, “you weren’t here”, “I just have to ask”; b) you will be healed, as they healed your grandmother. The experience of older relatives can really be quite sad: they diagnosed for a long time, treated, did not help, treated again, a lot of money and time down the drain, no health. Maybe it was the incompetence of doctors, or maybe that was the state of medicine at that time. Now, everything could change. Well, of course, if possible, it is better to go to a doctor who adheres to the principles of evidence-based medicine, and not to a random specialist in CHI or VHI. Here, by the way, I sometimes notice that people are being strangled by a toad. For example, there is a good doctor, but he sees in the private sector (this happens often). Suppose a patient, without any damage to his budget, can pay 3,000-5,000 rubles for an appointment. But since for a long time medicine was conditionally free for him (in fact, paid - for our taxes), it is psychologically difficult to give that kind of money. At the same time, if you think about it, there is no logic in such a decision. So you go to a random doctor, he prescribes an MRI, ultrasound, blood and urine tests, pointless physical therapy and ten more strange drugs. As a result, you spend more than for an appointment with a competent doctor who would prescribe only what is necessary. But, I think, everything will change: it is impossible to step on this rake endlessly.

In general, everything turned out by itself: I was offered, and since I had some free time, I did not refuse and just did the usual journalistic work. And so the book "Killer Wallpaper, Poison Water and the Seductive Chair" appeared.

I have several thousand articles saved in Pocket. If I search there for the word sleep, I will find a ton of good texts about all the possible and impossible aspects of this business. Also, American, British and Australian government organizations are doing a good job of conveying to people some basic, but very important rules. On their websites, for example, there are a lot of texts that meat should not be washed before cooking. Moreover, on one site there may be several pages devoted to this issue, with more or less the same content, but with slightly different wording. At first I was perplexed, and then a book came out, and every second comment under the materials about it was: “What kind of nonsense, how can you not wash this meat?” Then I realized: yes, they made the right decision there. We need to make videos about it, and memos, and FAQs, and just articles, and interviews - maybe this way people will be able to come to terms with this simple thought.

Five tips from Daria Sargsyan (after which you will want to read her book):

Use fluoride paste.
Throw away the washcloth and antibacterial soap.
If you have a small child in the house and you love dogs, get a dog.
Don't buy a filter without a water test.
Do not be afraid of monosodium glutamate, GMOs, microwaves, toilet seats, coffee, hormonal contraception, as well as computer work and fried foods.

Poster Daily publishes the chapter "What to drink", which talks about the dangers of water filters, the benefits of coffee and the meaninglessness of "live yogurt".

Daria Sargsyan

Medical journalist, editor of Meduza, co-founder of the Namochi Mantu telegram channel

If you do not figure out what kind of water to drink, then you can make the wrong choice, and it will certainly bring you to the grave. Heavy metals will settle in the liver and destroy it, chlorine will eat the mucous membranes, and this scale, God, this scale - it is so disgusting that it cannot but be poison. Water will slowly kill you if you don't figure out how to protect yourself. And so life without a water filter is a suicidal life. But - surprise! - there is no filter that would remove "all the bad" and leave "all the good". "Raw" tap water can be drinkable, while bottled water can lead to diarrhea or a stroke. How to figure it out? In fact, everything is simple.

Tap water

If you live in St. Petersburg, Adygeya, Moscow or the Stavropol Territory, then you are very lucky. At least for tap water. At least, he thinks so, who named these regions the best in his rating. Another thing is that water, passing through the pipes of your house, for which the housing and communal services, and not the water utility, are responsible, can change its qualities: the pipes rust, and, in addition to iron salts, bacteria settle in them. There are also seasonal fluctuations in the composition of substances, they mainly become noticeable when snow melts, and water utilities do not always cope well with the increased load. As a result, the water becomes unsafe and sometimes tastes bad. At the same time, without reagents and special equipment, you are not able to determine which filter you need, because you do not know what exactly your water is bad, if it is bad. You can, of course, put in an expensive reverse osmosis system, but this way you will remove magnesium and calcium from the water, among other things, which could still be useful to you, especially if you eat spinach, beans, nuts and. If you buy a reverse osmosis system with a mineralizer, then this is still a big expense, the meaning of which is not established if there is no water analysis.

That is, the filter must be selected strictly according to the indications. Like medicine. Water analysis is done in much the same way as urine analysis in network laboratories: either you bring the material to the laboratory, or a specialist comes to you for the material (if you plan to file a complaint with the water utility, it is better to choose the second option). Analyzes are different, and basically they differ in the number of indicators that the laboratory checks. The largest ones are usually needed if the water has a dubious origin: for example, it comes from a well. You can also see what deviations Rospotrebnadzor usually finds in your region and choose the analysis that investigates this problem.

There are several main methods:

a jug with a carbon filter (does not remove nitrates, bacteria and minerals; there are other restrictions depending on the type of filter);

ion-exchange filter (if there is ferric iron or iron bacteria in the water, the filter will deteriorate);

reverse osmosis system (does not remove all organic and inorganic impurities);

distiller (does not remove some volatile organic compounds, pesticides and volatile solvents; bacteria can settle on the internal elements of the distiller).

And don't forget to change parts of your cleaning system. For example, after the expiration of the service life, everything that he diligently collected From a letter from the bacteriologist of the independent laboratory "Invitro" Vasily Litvinov.

In a good way, one analysis can not do. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency test the water for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, solids, and pH every year, especially if the water pipes have been changed or repaired (perhaps best done during snowmelt when there is an increased risk of finding something in the water not that). It is also better to check the water if it has an unusual taste, smell or color. The Agency advises testing for sulfate, chloride, iron, manganese, hardness and oxidizability in this case. And it's even better to do it every three years, regardless of the circumstances. If for some reason a baby soon appears in the house, it is better to check the water for nitrates 7-8 months before and in the first six months of the child's life.

All this, rather, refers to cold water - you should not use hot water. Of course, it meets the same standards as cold SanPiN 2.1.4.1074–01, but hot water contributes to the oxidation of pipes and growth in them, that is, its composition is more unpredictable than that of cold water.

If you decide to drink tap water but don't like the smell of chlorine, there are several ways to deal with the problem. “Settling: you can simply leave the water in the vessel for several hours so that the chlorine gradually disappears,” explains Igor Buzin, an employee of the Moscow State University Analytical Center (Moscow). - Boiling: During the boiling process, chlorine quickly leaves the water. Whipping: you can beat the water with a mixer - with forced aeration, chlorine leaves quickly enough. Pitcher filter against chlorine - also good thing From a letter from Igor Buzin».

It’s not worth it to eat scale from the kettle on purpose, but there’s no point in panicking about it either.

As for boiled water, the kettle doesn't do anything particularly unacceptable to it. Boiling helps get rid of bacteria, viruses, and protozoa, which is great. In principle, many bacteria are not terrible for humans, and the body can cope with some pathogens quickly and painlessly, but if there is a person at home with a weakened immune system (really weakened - chemotherapy, untreated HIV infection, or something equally serious), it is better boil water.

About the scale that everyone is so afraid of, you need to know that it is relatively harmless: it is the deposition of calcium and magnesium carbonates. Some people even specially buy such substances in tablets: these are antacids, anti-heartburn remedies. Although, I must say, when taken regularly, they cause side effects, but here, of course, volumes must be taken into account: it is unlikely that you will have as much calcium carbonate in a mug of tea as in a tablet. That is, it’s not worth it to eat scale from the kettle on purpose, but it also makes no sense to be afraid of it in a panic. “In its pure form, the scale has a cream color (with shades), - says Igor Buzin. - If the scale is red or has any other color shades, this means that there are some metals in the water that can color this scale. So, iron is able to color scale in yellow, red and ocher tones, form veins and spots in it. Well, the rate of scale deposition and its amount will help to roughly estimate the content of hardness salts in water. You can boil water as many times as you like. The only consequence of this is a slightly higher concentration of substances present there. But there is nothing to worry about: for 1-3 times the water will not have time to evaporate so much that in one mug there is too large a portion of some harmful substance. To finally calm down, you can measure the volume of water before boiling and after (when the water cools down) and see that it has changed, to put it mildly, slightly.

bottled

Bottled water intuitively seems safe: it certainly checks better than the one that flows through the pipes. In fact, there are problems with it: “We had to check bottled water more than once, sometimes we actually found microorganisms in such water that should not be in drinking water,” says Vasily Litvinov, a bacteriologist at the independent Invitro laboratory. “In my opinion, this is due to the fact that these products were counterfeit.” Rospotrebnadzor also regularly finds poor-quality water, as reported on its website. That is, if you are categorically not satisfied with tap water, but you like some kind of bottled water and you plan to cook everything on it, from tea to soup, it might be worth analyzing it.

In general, the main question is “bottled or tap?” decided very individually. Perhaps drinking tap water is more difficult just psychologically. Science journalist Elizabeth Roit in her book Bottlemania Elizabeth Royte: Bottlemania. Big business, local springs, and the battle over America's drinking water. Bloomsbury, 2009 trying to choose a water source. In the end, she decides to drink tap water, however, having installed a filter (although the analysis showed that everything is in order with water). “By this point, I have spoken to enough scientists and environmental experts to believe that Brita (water filter. - Note. ed.) has more psychological than physical benefits for me,” admits Roit.

Mineral water

Bottled water can be table ( mineralization GOST R 54316–2011 less than 1 g/dm3), medical table (mineralization - from 1 to 10 g/dm3) and medical (mineralization - 10–15 g/dm3). The last two terms, it must be said, are misleading. The labels say that mineral water is useful for gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers, diseases of the endocrine system, hepatitis, colitis, bronchitis, gout, obesity, etc. - the list seems to be endless. But try asking PubMed about these properties of mineral water. Or Medscape. Or UpToDate. The most talkative will be PubMed (the rest will simply remain silent). It contains many articles about the healing properties of mineral waters. Only these articles appear in magazines like the domestic "Issues of balneology, physiotherapy and physiotherapy exercises." No Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, BMJ or any other publication in English (with rare exceptions). “For gastritis, stomach ulcers, mineral waters are practically meaningless,” says Alexey Paramonov, a gastroenterologist, director and managing partner of the Rassvet clinic. - They are a little effective except as a primitive antacid, as they contain soda. In those years when there was nothing effective but soda, the appointment of mineral water was probably adequate. Now, of course, this is not the way to treat it. Mineral water has historically been used mainly as a solution of magnesium salts, that is, as a laxative. But modern laxatives, although based on the same concept, are more effective and, if necessary, they should be used.

Mineral water with a high calcium content can weaken the effect of certain drugs or cause side effects.

Separately, I would like to talk about Borjomi and the role of this mineral water in nephrology - to answer an important question: is it too late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys have failed? And also: will Borjomi help people whose kidneys have not yet failed, but the process has begun? Can Borjomi be a remedy for preventing any kidney disease? People with chronic kidney disease have severe restrictions on mineral intake. Borjomi is a medicinal table water with a high sodium content, so people with such problems can drink it only very carefully. Moreover, modern medicine does not believe that the regular use of mineral water, especially with a large amount of sodium, is the prevention of kidney disease. So it is never too late to drink Borjomi (but not too early), moderate use of Borjomi should not be accompanied by value judgments at all.

Mineral water (especially medicinal and medicinal) can be a good source of calcium and magnesium (there are more of them than tap water). Arriving with water, they are good. But keep in mind that mineral water with a high calcium content can weaken the effect of certain drugs or provoke side effects (for example, thiazide diuretics and. Another thing is that along with calcium and magnesium in mineral water there is still the same sodium. A lot of sodium. Togo sodium, which is most dangerous in the NaCl compound, which is salt, which is “white death". An adult should eat no more than 2.3 g of sodium per day (this is about 5.75 g of salt). With medicinal mineral water, it can enter the body much more.And it is simply harmful if a person has high blood pressure, kidney or heart failure.

As for sparkling water, it is not clear whether there is any threat from it. The main concerns among doctors were related to the health of tooth enamel and osteoporosis (decrease in bone density), but it must be said that little research has been carried out. In the first case, the summary is: probably sparkling water, but maybe it hurts. In the second, there was no reason to recommend soda water to postmenopausal women (they have a particularly increased risk of developing osteoporosis), teenagers simply not to drink too much sweet soda. And the British National Health Service generally urges everyone who does not like still water to drink water with. For people with gastroesophageal reflux disease (often manifested by heartburn), carbonated water sometimes flares up. Such patients are better off. As well as people with and frequent.

Detox water and melt water

And, closing the topic of water, let's talk about water with unique properties, useful energy and healing power, as they write in gloss for inexplicable reasons. If you don't know what detox water is, then congratulations. But in general, this is water in which lemons, cucumbers, mint and anything else “organic, rich in vitamins and antioxidants” are placed, cooled and drunk, thinking that all these plants have given useful substances to the water and now the water is using them to flush out toxins from the body (And that's with zero calories). That is, it is assumed that the lemon, simply being in cold water, without any special physical impact, gave up “only useful”, and this “useful” went to fight with slags (which ones are not specified). It cannot be said that these are justified and logical statements. It should be noted that the main popularizers of this healing method are by no means doctors, but, for example, one of the Kardashian sisters and her.

A healthy diet can include 400 mg of caffeine per day (that's about 3-5 cups of coffee)

The fascination with melt water belongs to the same amazing category. It is believed that if water is frozen and then thawed, it acquires new magical properties. Lovers of melt water emphasize the peculiarities of its molecular structure, the fact that there is no "harmful deuterium" in melt water. Deuterium is "heavy" water, in the hydrogen nucleus from this water there is a neutron, which makes the molecule heavier. Molecules of "heavy" water in a small amount () are also in "light". But freezing / thawing does not get rid of deuterium: this requires much more complex ones.

As for the special structure of water after melting, nothing is known to science about the possibility of structuring water at its discretion, although the question is,.

There are still a huge number of types of water with amazing properties that have not been confirmed by science, but at the time of this writing, it is detox water and melt water that have become fashionable.

Coffee

Coffee has had a bad reputation for a long time. And although the results of research regularly turned out to be for him, then against him, wariness always won. But now - attention! shock! sensation! - the study of an unreal array of works on the effect of coffee on the body has led to the fact that the pros have officially outweighed and coffee has ceased to be a "bad guy". The Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020 states that a healthy diet can include 400 mg of caffeine per day (that's about 3-5 cups of coffee). It used to be that coffee was a terrible diuretic. A recent meta-analysis has shown that caffeine consumption increases urine volume, and such drinks can even be consumed by athletes during training. And to finally clean up coffee's reputation: no specific recommendations for coffee consumption by people with hypertension. From it, blood pressure rises slightly (by 10 mm Hg), for a short time and only in those people who rarely drink coffee.

Tea

Tea is probably the least controversial of all the liquids that a person can pour into himself daily. There are many studies that claim that tea protects against Alzheimer's disease, helps fight cancer and promotes weight loss. But none of these or any other similar ideas have a solid scientific basis - the studies from which such conclusions are drawn are not of sufficient quality to recommend that everyone should drink a few cups of tea a day.

With regard to tea, you need to strain when a person drinks herbal teas daily. First, their effects on health are poorly understood. Secondly, the quality and safety of herbal preparations is controlled much worse than the quality of medicines. Thirdly, herbs may well interact with the drugs you are taking and produce unpleasant reactions. Therefore, if you really like some herbal tea, read about it at least on the website of the American National Center for Complementary and Integrative Medicine - nccih.nih.gov and check compatibility with the drugs you are taking.

Juice, fruit drink and smoothies

Juice, fruit drink and smoothies - it would seem that it could be healthier. But no. Those juices and fruit drinks that are sold in bags often have added sugar, which is not great if a person wants to consume a decent amount of carbohydrates per day. Smoothies and freshly squeezed juices can also have an excess of sugar - not even added: one glass of freshly squeezed orange juice will take at least 3-4 citrus fruits. Would you be able to eat that much at once over and over again? Very doubtful. But if you choose between smoothies and juices, then, of course, smoothies are better: at least they have fiber, which should be included in a healthy diet.

And now attention, lovers of grapefruit juice. This is one of the most hated juices by doctors. It reverses the action of statins, nifedipine, amiodarone, cyclosporine, and many others. If you drink grapefruit juice and take any medications, ask if you are harming yourself.

Milk and yoghurts

If you don't have lactose intolerance Not all lactose intolerant people are aware of this. To understand if you have such a disorder, drink a glass of milk. If your stomach hurts, you start to actively form gases or diarrhea begins - most likely you have lactose intolerance. Lactose intolerance: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management, milk in the diet is. It is high in protein, calcium, vitamin D and potassium. Choosing pasteurized or "live and real" that lives in a matter of days is a matter of taste and risk assessment. Pasteurized milk is definitely something that came out of a cow and nothing special has been done to it other than pasteurization, i.e. heating. UHT “Even in the people’s memory, the word “sterilized” has been preserved. These are also higher temperatures, but the technology is somewhat different, and the taste changed significantly there - there was a taste of boiling and caramel from burnt lactose. Then they created a modern technology, without these defects. The word “ultra-pasteurization” was coined for ultra-high-temperature processing precisely in order to separate it from the old “sterilization” and get rid of negative connotations” - from a letter from Maxim Melnikov, Deputy Director for Economics and Finance of the agricultural enterprise Voshchazhnikovo, which supplies milk to the Danone company , "Umalat" and "Valio".- this is the one that was heated to higher temperatures, but for a shorter period of time. There is no reason to call such milk "unnatural" Unnatural - in the sense that it was not produced by someone else's body.. If manipulations were performed with this milk that seriously changed the composition, it would be called differently - for example, a dairy product. Temperature treatment is needed to kill bacteria, and after it, milk can be stored from several days to several months. How much exactly depends on various factors. The fact is that after processing, bacteria still remain in the milk, albeit in a small amount. They cannot cause any disease in humans, but due to their reproduction, milk can deteriorate. It is also important that no new bacteria get into the milk (the quality of equipment and organization of processes is responsible for this) and that there is very good packaging that will not allow the remaining bacteria to multiply and will not allow ultraviolet radiation spoil the taste of milk From a letter from Maxim Melnikov.. UHT, for example, is packaged under aseptic conditions in complex packaging, thanks to which it can be stored for months. Pasteurized milk can live up to 21 days, but for this, as Maxim Melnikov, deputy director for economics and finance at the Voshchazhnikovo agricultural enterprise, explains, “high purity of the product must be ensured throughout the chain: very good milk (“low bacterial contamination”, “low somatics”), good transportation (quality milk trucks, properly washed), good processing equipment, good (“aseptic”) packaging equipment, good packaging, cold logistics to the store, cold shelf in the store.”

If you are healthy, then there is no evidence that you need "live yogurt"

There is milk that has a very short lifespan, but according to some people it tastes better. Usually it is pasteurized, but its shelf life is no more than five days. For some reason, it is customary to call such milk “natural” and contrast it with that which can be stored for months. But in reality, this is just milk that has been pasteurized on not the best equipment and which has been poured into simpler and cheaper packaging. Short-lived milk is also "raw", that is, not thermally processed. By technical regulations Technical regulation of the Customs Union "On the safety of milk and dairy products" (TR CU 033/2013) its manufacturer / seller is obliged to warn the buyer that milk must be boiled before drinking: a cow unfamiliar to you can be a source of E. coli, salmonella and much more.

The big question when it comes to liquid yogurt is with or without probiotics? And here you need to understand very well why you might need probiotics. If you are healthy, then there is no evidence that "live yogurt". Probiotics (and even then not all - yes, they are different) have shown effectiveness only in certain diseases. At the same time, after transportation, and then waiting for the buyer, there may no longer be at least some decent yogurt in yogurt. And, of course, you need to remember that yogurt is far from the best form of delivery of probiotics: capsules that dissolve only in the intestines and do not allow bacteria to pass through all the horror of hydrochloric acid are clearly more reliable.

Cola and other sweet drinks

Despite the fact that these are "solid chemistry", the biggest evil in them is not ingredients with unpronounceable names, but carbohydrates. By themselves, carbohydrates are good and healthy. But not in excess. And it is better that they go in the company with useful substances like vitamins or minerals. Otherwise, it will turn out that you have consumed calories, and everything else necessary for the normal functioning of the body is not, and food with these same vitamins and minerals in the right amount no longer "climbs".

Alcohol

Considering alcohol as the main source of liquid is risky. But still, doctors approve of its periodic moderate use because of the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (although it cannot be said that they recommend it: if you don’t drink, you don’t need to start, they say). There are two things to keep in mind when drinking alcohol: the amount of calories and the amount of alcohol. I must say, the rate of alcohol consumption in different countries How much to drink? Eight glasses a day? According to this logic, both a 100-kilogram inhabitant of Egypt, who worked in a rocking chair, and a miniature Swede, who has lain on the couch all day, should drink two liters of water. Of course, the obligatory 8 glasses of clean water a day is not true and has nothing to do with a healthy lifestyle. The body is quite satisfied with any other form of fluid intake - up to meat and pizza (yes, there is some liquid there). In favor of plain water, the specialists of the American Mayo Clinic cite only “<она>calorie-free, inexpensive and readily available.” If you hope to detect the famous “hidden dehydration” by counting what you eat and drink, then it’s in vain: you will learn about the lack of fluid from your body (we call this signal thirst), the notification system works well for almost everyone. Problems can only be in older people: with age, the mechanism of thirst worsens. So you will know about your dehydration, and there can be no “hidden dehydration”.

Daria Sargsyan's book “Killer Wallpaper, Poisonous Water and Seductive Chair. How to survive in your own apartment ”you can buy.

Daria Sargsyan

Killer wallpaper, poisonous water and seductive chair. How to survive in your own apartment

* * *

Publishing house Individuum

Editor Alexey Portnov

Managing editor Alina Saydasheva

Project producer Anastasia Chukovskaya

Proofreaders Alena Merkuryeva, Natalya Vitko, Anna Vasilyeva

Editorial Director Maria Polyakova

Artistic design Alina Aleinikova

Photographer - Masha Kushnir

* * *

Popular science edition

Sargsyan, Daria Vladimirovna.

Killer wallpapers, poisonous water and a seductive chair: How to survive in your own apartment / Daria Sargsyan. - 3rd ed., Rev. and additional - Moscow: Individual, 2018.: ill. - (Health).

OOO Individual Publishing

individuum-books.ru

instagram.com/individuum_books

facebook.com/individuumbooks

www.vk.com/individuumbooks

Why do I use this particular toothbrush?

Well, she's simple and beautiful. And the bells and whistles that other brushes have are probably pure marketing, they are of no use.

Why this toothpaste?

She smells good.

Why do I brush my teeth this way?

Used to it since childhood.

Why don't I have interdental brushes, irrigators, and other dentifrice devices?

Hm. Because life is too short for me to spend it on interdental brushes? I don't know, I didn't think about it.

If you have the same answer, then this book is for you. The wrong choice of toothpaste brings the day when the teeth need treatment. Due to improper hand washing, you are more likely to get sick with SARS. By defrosting meat incorrectly (at room temperature, not in the refrigerator), you increase the risk of food poisoning. Every day we do a lot of little stupid things of this kind. Just because we don't think about it. Simply because they are used to it.

Sometimes the opposite happens. We are afraid of something that is completely harmless (well, almost harmless): scale, a microwave oven, or a monitor that supposedly kills our eyesight.

I tried to understand all this from the point of view of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine is good because it has the tools to provide a reasoned answer to the question “Why?”. Why do dental professional communities recommend fluoride toothpaste? Because in well-conducted studies, this approach has proven effective in preventing tooth decay. If there were no such studies, then we would know that we know nothing. And this is also good: we would not be fooled by the ardent belief that only a paste with tea tree oil and grated pearls can protect against caries. "Where is your proof?" - "They are not here". However, due to the relatively small number of good studies, such verification of information is often unsupported and leads to some confusion. Still, it's better to know that we don't know something and accept it than to blindly believe.

Together with Marianna Mirzoyan and Karina Nazaretyan - they are also medical journalists - in January 2016 we started a channel in Telegram (essentially a blog) called "Wet Mantu". The name may seem strange, but it has an important message. I think that more or less all people who grew up in the USSR and Russia know that the manta sample cannot be wetted. This taboo sits firmly in the head, and few people even think that everything could be different. We want people to question such "well-known facts" and look for evidence. Because in the end it turns out that the mantu sample can be wetted, with a sore throat, you even need to eat ice cream, and you can’t wash the meat before cooking.

There are not so many decent sources with which you can check the information. There are practically none in Russian, mostly in English, because there is no local medicine - there is world medicine, and the language in which doctors and scientists from all over the world share information is English. All manuals of professional medical societies, all scientific journals that meet strict requirements - in English. Scientific articles are collected in the PubMed.com database. But the fact of publication itself is not a sign of the quality of the article, of course, and each article needs to be dealt with separately, this is a rather complicated process that requires certain skills. Therefore, in medical practice, the guidelines of professional communities are more often relevant: based on the analysis of scientific articles, experts recommend how to prevent, diagnose, treat, and so on. These guidelines can be found on the websites of the professional organizations themselves or on ClinicalKey.com. Useful, fact-checked texts about a variety of diseases and conditions are available at UpToDate.com and Medscape.com. These are all sources for doctors, nurses and journalists. Maybe even for advanced patients. For everyone else, for example, the state sites MedlinePlus.gov (USA) and NHS.uk (UK) have been created - information is simplified there. A section for patients is also available at UpToDate - uptodate.com/patients. There are other sites, but MedlinePlus works as an aggregator and links to almost everything decent. Using these sources, you can find answers to most questions about health.

I wrote this book based on the sites listed above, and also talked to doctors, looked at what doctors told my foreign colleagues, and checked every fact that seemed obvious. And if you, while reading, stumble upon some strange statement - you can always look at the footnotes and familiarize yourself with the source. Some things you just don't want to believe, and,

This is the third, updated and revised edition of the book. The science...

Read completely

Every day we do hundreds of stupid things - in the kitchen, in the bathroom, in the bedroom and at the desk. For some reason, with the effort of three ourselves with a washcloth, we buy orthopedic mattresses and are afraid of going blind from constant work at the computer.
From this book you will learn how to live according to science and not die prematurely. Debunking myths on every page!
We don't need antibacterial soap
- But the paste must be chosen wisely, otherwise you will have to treat your teeth later
- Due to improper hand washing, we are more likely to get ARVI
- Water filters can harm us
- The toilet seat is cleaner than it looks, but the carpet is not very
- Terribly sorry, but kissing pets is still not worth it
Medical journalist Daria Sargsyan tried to understand our everyday behavior from the point of view of evidence-based medicine: what is good for us, what is categorically not, and what does not make sense at all. "Why so, and not otherwise?" is her favorite question.
This is the third, updated and revised edition of the book. Science does not stand still, scientists continue their research and publish new articles, so Daria re-checked all the facts, updated scientific information and rewrote the chapter "About air". Let this book become your desktop, and it is also studied in the lessons of life safety, distributed in medical institutions, passed from hand to hand and helps to live.

Killer wallpaper, poisonous water and seductive chair. How to survive in your own apartment - description and summary, author Daria Sargsyan, read for free online on the website of the electronic library site

We don't need antibacterial soap

But the paste must be chosen wisely, otherwise you will have to treat your teeth later

Due to improper hand washing, we are more likely to get ARVI

Water filters can harm us

The toilet seat is cleaner than it looks, but the carpet is not very

Terribly sorry, but kissing pets is still not worth it.

Medical journalist Daria Sargsyan tried to understand our everyday behavior from the point of view of evidence-based medicine: what is good for us, what is categorically not, and what does not make sense at all. "Why so, and not otherwise?" is her favorite question.